Update patch set 1

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 1
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000010 \u003c1000010@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000010\u003e replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000074 \u003c1000074@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000010\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 1000010 2024-03-13 12:21:54 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 186eb7527e
commit 63e38c0e55
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -17,6 +17,24 @@
"revId": "a9d8c3ee3cd5babc3a141061beb3182a6aecef14",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "2ff44d28_fab6d82e",
"filename": "library/L1CTL_Types.ttcn",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 859,
"author": {
"id": 1000010
},
"writtenOn": "2024-03-13T12:21:54Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Can you explain the motivation behind marking the whole template as `(present)`? I do understand and encourage doing this for template fields, I also understand the reason for declaring send templates as `(value)`, but I cannot find any explanation what would `(present)` yield for a receive template.",
"parentUuid": "b88cc276_adff2300",
"revId": "a9d8c3ee3cd5babc3a141061beb3182a6aecef14",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {