ttcn3
/
osmo-ttcn3-hacks
mirror of https://gerrit.osmocom.org/osmo-ttcn3-hacks
10
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

gbproxy: Use g_parse.sgsn_idx for paging 

The ConnHdlr test stores the sgsn_idx in g_pars. Use that in the paging
tests to the correct SGSN pages the MS.
This commit fixes what 4332044c missed and is required for the ptp paging
reject test to pass.

Change-Id: Id85ffa57af943ae98c0f022b261ec24d557c236d
Related: OS#4951
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Willmann 2021-01-18 18:50:02 +01:00 committed by laforge
parent 04358655bf
commit 2a33067570
1 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn
View File

@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_bss(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
/* doesn't really make sense: Sending to a single BVCI means the message ends up
* at that BVC (cell) only, and paging all over the BSS area is not possible */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4BssArea, 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4BssArea, g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_bss() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_lac(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
var template (present) PDU_BSSGP exp_rx;
/* doesn't really make sense: Sending to a single BVCI means the message ends up
* at that BVC (cell) only, and paging all over the BSS area is not possible */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].cell_id.ra_id.lai), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].cell_id.ra_id.lai), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_lac() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_lac_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_Con
lac := 33333
};
/* as it's sent on the PTP BVC, we expect it to pass even for unknown LAC */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(unknown_la), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(unknown_la), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_lac_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_rac(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
/* doesn't really make sense: Sending to a single BVCI means the message ends up
* at that BVC (cell) only, and paging all over the BSS area is not possible */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].cell_id.ra_id), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].cell_id.ra_id), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_rac() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_rac_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_Con
rac := 254
};
/* as it's sent on the PTP BVC, we expect it to pass even for unknown RAC */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(unknown_ra), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(unknown_ra), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_rac_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_rac_unknown() runs on test_CT {
private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_bvci(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
/* this should be the normal case for MS in READY MM state after a lower layer failure */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].bvci), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].bvci), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_bvci() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ testcase TC_paging_ps_reject_ptp_bvci() runs on test_CT {
private function f_TC_paging_ps_reject_ptp_bvci(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
/* first send the PS-PAGING from SGSN -> PCU */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].bvci), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(pcu_bvc_cfg[0].bvci), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
/* then simulate the PS-PAGING-REJECT from the PCU */
f_send_paging_ps_rej(use_sig:=false);
}
@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ testcase TC_paging_ps_reject_ptp_bvci_imsi() runs on test_CT {
private function f_TC_paging_ps_ptp_bvci_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
/* as it's sent on the PTP BVC, we expect it to pass even for unknown BVCI */
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(33333), 0, false, 0);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_one_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(33333), g_pars.sgsn_idx, false, 0);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_ptp_bvci_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_sig_lac_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_Con
mcc_mnc := '567F99'H,
lac := 33333
};
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(unknown_la), 0, true);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4LAC(unknown_la), g_pars.sgsn_idx, true);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_sig_lac_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ private function f_TC_paging_ps_sig_rac_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_Con
},
rac := 254
};
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(unknown_ra), 0, true);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4RAC(unknown_ra), g_pars.sgsn_idx, true);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_sig_rac_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();
@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ testcase TC_paging_ps_reject_sig_bvci_imsi() runs on test_CT {
/* PS-PAGING on SIG-BVC for unknown BVCI */
private function f_TC_paging_ps_sig_bvci_unknown(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr
{
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(33333), 0, true);
f_send_paging_ps_exp_no_bss(ts_BssgpP4Bvci(33333), g_pars.sgsn_idx, true);
}
testcase TC_paging_ps_sig_bvci_unknown() runs on test_CT {
f_init();