The >>bindWith: or >>% is not available in Pharo and other dialects.
From a licensing point of view it is easier to introduce the Pharo
equivalent to GST than to use the GST code in Pharo. Add a simple testcase
for some parts of the API. Pharo doesn't appear to use the % and ?
syntax at all.
When dispatching everything in the same context we avoid all kind
of issues with locking. If we use a truely multi threaded VM we could
probably use multiple dispatchers.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther