FS-4709 this is the right way to do this part

This commit is contained in:
Anthony Minessale 2013-02-26 15:32:19 -06:00
parent 32806de57c
commit 50e7a09eca
2 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_dtmf_unlock(switch_channel_t *cha
\param dtmf digit
\return SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS if successful
*/
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf(_In_ switch_channel_t *channel, _In_ switch_dtmf_t *dtmf);
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf(_In_ switch_channel_t *channel, _In_ const switch_dtmf_t *dtmf);
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf_string(_In_ switch_channel_t *channel, _In_ const char *dtmf_string);
/*!

View File

@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_size_t) switch_channel_has_dtmf(switch_channel_t *channel)
return has;
}
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf(switch_channel_t *channel, switch_dtmf_t *dtmf)
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf(switch_channel_t *channel, const switch_dtmf_t *dtmf)
{
switch_status_t status;
void *pop;
@ -398,13 +398,13 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_queue_dtmf(switch_channel_t *chan
switch_assert(dtmf);
if (sensitive) {
switch_set_flag(dtmf, DTMF_FLAG_SENSITIVE);
}
switch_mutex_lock(channel->dtmf_mutex);
new_dtmf = *dtmf;
if (sensitive) {
switch_set_flag((&new_dtmf), DTMF_FLAG_SENSITIVE);
}
if ((status = switch_core_session_recv_dtmf(channel->session, dtmf) != SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS)) {
goto done;
}