For some reason the AT91rm9200 lowlevel init writes to a bunch of
reserved or read-only addresses. All the boards seem to define the
value-to-be-written values as zero ... but they shouldn't actually
be writing *anything* there.
No documented erratum justifies these accesses. It looks like maybe
some pre-release BDI-2000 setup code has been carried along by cargo
cult programming since at least late 2004 (per GIT history).
Here's a patch disabling what seems to be bogosity. Tested on a
csb337; there were no behavioral changes.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
on RM9200ek
Tested-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
This patch renames NAND_MAX_CHIPS to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS and
changes the default from 8 to 1 for the legacy and the new MTD
NAND layer. This allows to remove all NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
in the board config files because none of the boards use multi
chip support (NAND_MAX_CHIPS > 1) so far. The bamboo and the DU440
define
#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE
but that's bogus and did not work anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
This patch fix the broken boot from NOR Flash on AT91RM9200 boards, if
CONFIG_AT91RM9200 is defined and nor preloader is used.
Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <esw@bus-elektronik.de>
Tried fixing NAND support for the at91rm9200dk board; untested.
Disabled NAND support in the csb637 board config file.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
This fixes a naming bug for at91rm9200 lowlevel init code:
NOR boot flash is on chipselect 0, not chipselect 2. This
makes code use the register name from chip datasheets.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Explicitly add in default CONFIG_BOOTP_* options where cmd_confdefs.h
used to be included but CONFIG_BOOTP_MASK was not defined.
Remove lingering references to CFG_CMD_* symbols.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
David Brownell