In dedicated mode a frame is sent to layer 1. Subsequent frames are queued
inside lapdm.c until a confirm from layer 1 is received. Since not all
pending frames are sent rapidly at once, the layer 1 does not crash anymore.
Also included in this commit: handling of reset confirm (maybe required
in the future after dedicated mode)
Now layer23 supports selecting TS 0-4 with SDCCH/8 channels.
But some tests showed me that it doesn't work. Please help debugging.
Added DM release function to l1ctl.c and gsm48_rr.c.
We include all the parameters we're gonna need to support
TS!=0, hopping, TSC, ...
We also assume the upper layer have decoded the low level
bit fields and gives us neat accessible variables and a
sorted ARFCN array for the Mobile Allocation
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
We introduce the concept of CCCH mode. It can be either
- NONE: receive BCCCH only
- COMBINED: CCCH on a BCCH/CCCH+SDDCH/4
- NON_COMBINED: CCCH on a BCCH/CCCH
There is also a new command to change the mode without having
to do the resync.
Currently, we keep the previous default behavior of requesting
a combined CCCH by default
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
liblayer23. Other applications using liblayer23 don't need to re-implement it.
Messages from layer 1 are not freed in layer2_read() anymore. They will be
freed by the upper layers. The layers may also decide to queue or to forward
the messages. In general: A message is always discarded by the message handler
and not after calling the message handler.
* port 'mobile' application to new l1ctl_tx_fbsb_req()
* make sure we have a proper downlinke header in front of l1ctl_fbsb_resp
* remove duplicate band_arfcn member of struct l1ctl_fbsb_resp
* reset the AFC to its default value when starting new FBSB task
* remove bogus l1s.sb.{synced.count} variables
* allocate msg and send l1ctl_fbsb_resp() only from process context, not FIQ
* properly report SNR and BSIC in fbsb_resp
* introduce arbitrary SNR thresholds for FB0->FB1 and FB1->SB switching
We really want to have those two as distinct operations - and we
want proper state machines in L1 to quickly return if they've
managed to acquire a FB or SB or not. Otherwise scanning will
take ages...
This code now introduces a new l1ctl_fbsb_req that is sent via
L1CTL to ask for a bitmask of FB0/FB1/SB operations. The actual
FB0/FB1 detection now no longer runs for 500 TDMA interrupts
but completes as soon as we either know there is no FCCH,
or that our frequency error is smaller than a caller-specified
threshold.
FB0/FB1 are already working, SB is not yet, sorry.
The arfcn variable is renamed to test_arfcn.
I think that arfcn and other frequency parameters should be stored at
the process which sets it and using it when calling l1ctl_tx_ccch_req().
similar to the concept of having 'apps' in the firmware build process,
I'm now building the common code as liblayer23 and we have three apps
that use this library:
layer23 - the old layer23 program
bcch_scan - a passive bcch scanner under development
echo_test - a test program sending large msgb's containing zero bytes
* introduce a new 'l1ctl_hdr' structure common to all messages
on this interface
* use struct l1ctl_hdr in both the firmware and layer23
* add a new L1CTL_PM_REQ request for performing layer23-initiated
power measurements (firmware does not implement them yet)
* remove linuxlist.h copy and use osmocore
* don't put 'struct gsm_time' into l1ctl packets
* include rx_level and snr for each burst in l1ctl
* properly build libosmocore.a for target
* move gsmtime functions into libosmocore
* move ctype.h to standard location
* use GSMTAP for uplink frames (generated by layer23; sent to L1)
* only use GSMTAP if the user specifies the '-i dstip' arguments
* properly encode the GSMTAP channel type
* requires GSMTAP protocol version 0x02 (see next commit for wireshark patch)
Andreas.Eversberg
Harald Welte
Sylvain Munaut