9
0
Fork 0

Add UDP poll issue

git-svn-id: https://nuttx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/nuttx/trunk@1279 7fd9a85b-ad96-42d3-883c-3090e2eb8679
This commit is contained in:
patacongo 2008-11-18 22:15:12 +00:00
parent 49bb914e8f
commit 629dac3665
1 changed files with 15 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ NuttX TODO List (Last updated November 17, 2008)
(1) Signals (sched/, arch/)
(1) pthreads (sched/)
(1) C++ Support
(12) Network (net/, netutils/)
(14) Network (net/, netutils/)
(1) USB (drivers/usbdev)
(4) Libraries (lib/)
(6) File system/Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
@ -206,6 +206,20 @@ o Network (net/, netutils/)
Status: Open
Priority: Low
Description: TCP supports read-ahead buffering to handle the receipt of
TCP/IP packets when there is no read() in place. Should such
capability be useful for UDP? PRO: Would reduce packet loss
and enable support for poll()/select(). CON: UDP is inherently
lossy so why waste memory footprint?
Status: Open
Priority: Medium
Description: poll()/select is not implement for UDP sockets because they do
do not support read-ahead buffering. Therefore, there is never
a case where you can read from a UDP socket without blocking.
Status: Open, depends on UDP read-ahead support
Priority: Medium
o USB (drivers/usbdev)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^