9
0
Fork 0

Fix an assertion

This commit is contained in:
Gregory Nutt 2013-06-02 16:49:41 -06:00
parent 77bb79ef7f
commit 53c51e08dd
4 changed files with 18 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -4868,3 +4868,5 @@
the SAM4L (2013-6-2).
* libc/stdio/lib_dprintd.c and lib_vdprintf.c: Add dprintf() and
vdprintf() (the latter from Andrew Tridgell, 2013-6-2).
* sched/sem_holder.c: Modify assertion that is reported to cause
false alarm assertions (2013-6-2).

View File

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
# This first group of C files do not depend on having file descriptors or
# C streams.
CSRCS += lib_fileno.c lib_printf.c lib_syslog.c lib_lowsyslog.c\
CSRCS += lib_fileno.c lib_printf.c lib_syslog.c lib_lowsyslog.c \
lib_sprintf.c lib_asprintf.c lib_snprintf.c lib_libsprintf.c \
lib_vsprintf.c lib_avsprintf.c lib_vsnprintf.c lib_libvsprintf.c \
lib_dprintf.c lib_vdprintf.c \

View File

@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ int vdprintf(int fd, FAR const char *fmt, va_list ap)
lib_rawoutstream(&rawoutstream, fd);
return lib_vsprintf(&rawoutstream.public, fmt, ap);
}
}

View File

@ -448,11 +448,22 @@ static int sem_restoreholderprio(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder, FAR sem_t *sem
if (htcb->npend_reprio < 1)
{
/* No... the holder thread has only been boosted once. Reset all
* priorities back to the base priority.
/* No... the holder thread has only been boosted once.
* npend_reprio should be 0 and the boosted priority should be the
* priority of the task that just got the semaphore
* (stcb->sched_priority)
*
* That latter assumption may not be true if the stcb's priority
* was also boosted so that it no longer matches the htcb's
* sched_priority. Or if CONFIG_SEM_NNESTPRIO is too small (so
* that we do not have a proper record of the reprioritizations).
*/
DEBUGASSERT(htcb->sched_priority == stcb->sched_priority && htcb->npend_reprio == 0);
DEBUGASSERT(/* htcb->sched_priority == stcb->sched_priority && */
htcb->npend_reprio == 0);
/* Reset the holder's priority back to the base priority. */
sched_reprioritize(htcb, htcb->base_priority);
}