osmocom
/
wireshark
14
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

From metatech: 

- In DRDA the data is of different "nature" : EBCDIC vs ASCII, so I think they
deserve different field names.

svn path=/trunk/; revision=25902
This commit is contained in:
Anders Broman 2008-08-01 18:17:23 +00:00
parent 18b69aef03
commit bb54e0bb03
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
epan/dissectors/packet-drda.c
View File

@ -863,13 +863,13 @@ proto_register_drda(void)
{ "Data (ASCII)", "drda.param.data", FT_STRING, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "Param data left as ASCII for display", HFILL }},
{ &hf_drda_param_data_ebcdic,
{ "Data (EBCDIC)", "drda.param.data", FT_EBCDIC, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "Param data converted from EBCDIC to ASCII for display", HFILL }},
{ "Data (EBCDIC)", "drda.param.data.ebcdic", FT_EBCDIC, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "Param data converted from EBCDIC to ASCII for display", HFILL }},
{ &hf_drda_sqlstatement,
{ "SQL statement (ASCII)", "drda.sqlstatement", FT_STRING, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "SQL statement left as ASCII for display", HFILL }},
{ &hf_drda_sqlstatement_ebcdic,
{ "SQL statement (EBCDIC)", "drda.sqlstatement", FT_EBCDIC, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "SQL statement converted from EBCDIC to ASCII for display", HFILL }}
{ "SQL statement (EBCDIC)", "drda.sqlstatement.ebcdic", FT_EBCDIC, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, "SQL statement converted from EBCDIC to ASCII for display", HFILL }}
};
static gint *ett[] = {