osmocom
/
wireshark
11
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Plug a memory leak in the "Find Frame" code - we weren't freeing the 

protocol tree after checking whether it matched the filter we supplied.

svn path=/trunk/; revision=1814
This commit is contained in:
Guy Harris 2000-04-07 07:48:15 +00:00
parent f20f651cd0
commit 76f0935df9
1 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
file.c
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* file.c
* File I/O routines
*
* $Id: file.c,v 1.179 2000/04/06 06:04:24 guy Exp $
* $Id: file.c,v 1.180 2000/04/07 07:48:15 guy Exp $
*
* Ethereal - Network traffic analyzer
* By Gerald Combs <gerald@zing.org>
@ -1138,6 +1138,7 @@ find_packet(capture_file *cf, dfilter *sfcode)
guint32 progbar_nextstep;
int count;
proto_tree *protocol_tree;
gboolean frame_matched;
int row;
start_fd = cf->current_frame;
@ -1207,7 +1208,9 @@ find_packet(capture_file *cf, dfilter *sfcode)
protocol_tree = proto_tree_create_root();
wtap_seek_read(cf->cd_t, cf->fh, fd->file_off, cf->pd, fd->cap_len);
dissect_packet(cf->pd, fd, protocol_tree);
if (dfilter_apply(sfcode, protocol_tree, cf->pd)) {
frame_matched = dfilter_apply(sfcode, protocol_tree, cf->pd);
proto_tree_free(protocol_tree);
if (frame_matched) {
new_fd = fd;
break; /* found it! */
}