osmocom
/
wireshark
11
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Be careful about reporting number of missing SNs when wrapping around SN range. 

svn path=/trunk/; revision=39088
This commit is contained in:
Martin Mathieson 2011-09-22 15:28:46 +00:00
parent 86878844b6
commit 4a3d86e46c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
epan/dissectors/packet-rlc-lte.c
View File

@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static void addChannelSequenceInfo(state_sequence_analysis_report_in_frame *p,
p_rlc_lte_info->ueid);
proto_item_append_text(seqnum_ti, " - SNs missing (%u to %u)",
p->firstSN, p->lastSN);
tap_info->missingSNs = ((p->lastSN - p->firstSN) % 1024) + 1;
tap_info->missingSNs = ((1024 + p->lastSN - p->firstSN) % 1024) + 1;
}
else {
expert_add_info_format(pinfo, ti, PI_SEQUENCE, PI_WARN,
@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static void addChannelSequenceInfo(state_sequence_analysis_report_in_frame *p,
p_rlc_lte_info->ueid);
proto_item_append_text(seqnum_ti, " - SNs missing (%u to %u)",
p->firstSN, p->lastSN);
tap_info->missingSNs = ((p->lastSN - p->firstSN) % snLimit) + 1;
tap_info->missingSNs = ((snLimit + p->lastSN - p->firstSN) % snLimit) + 1;
}
else {
expert_add_info_format(pinfo, ti, PI_SEQUENCE, PI_WARN,