Fix a bug in RPC where the RCP_DUP items where not always added to the tree
and were thus not always filterable. At the same time, change the dup fields to be placed visibly in the tree and point to the original of the dup. svn path=/trunk/; revision=8064
This commit is contained in:
parent
d98ee5ef39
commit
09b4172ac4
34
packet-rpc.c
34
packet-rpc.c
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
* Routines for rpc dissection
|
||||
* Copyright 1999, Uwe Girlich <Uwe.Girlich@philosys.de>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $Id: packet-rpc.c,v 1.132 2003/07/17 23:08:52 guy Exp $
|
||||
* $Id: packet-rpc.c,v 1.133 2003/07/22 11:51:20 sahlberg Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Ethereal - Network traffic analyzer
|
||||
* By Gerald Combs <gerald@ethereal.com>
|
||||
|
@ -2012,13 +2012,11 @@ dissect_rpc_message(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree,
|
|||
if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO)) {
|
||||
col_append_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO,
|
||||
" dup XID 0x%x", xid);
|
||||
if (rpc_tree) {
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint_hidden(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_dup, tvb, 0,0, xid);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint_hidden(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_call_dup, tvb, 0,0, xid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_dup, tvb, 0,0, TRUE);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_call_dup, tvb, 0,0, rpc_call->req_num);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
|
@ -2187,13 +2185,11 @@ dissect_rpc_message(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree,
|
|||
if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO)) {
|
||||
col_append_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO,
|
||||
" dup XID 0x%x", xid);
|
||||
if (rpc_tree) {
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint_hidden(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_dup, tvb, 0,0, xid);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint_hidden(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_reply_dup, tvb, 0,0, xid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_dup, tvb, 0,0, TRUE);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_uint(rpc_tree,
|
||||
hf_rpc_reply_dup, tvb, 0,0, rpc_call->rep_num);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3343,14 +3339,14 @@ proto_register_rpc(void)
|
|||
"Machine Name", "rpc.auth.machinename", FT_STRING,
|
||||
BASE_DEC, NULL, 0, "Machine Name", HFILL }},
|
||||
{ &hf_rpc_dup, {
|
||||
"Duplicate Transaction", "rpc.dup", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "Duplicate Transaction", HFILL }},
|
||||
"Duplicate Call/Reply", "rpc.dup", FT_NONE, BASE_NONE,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "Duplicate Call/Reply", HFILL }},
|
||||
{ &hf_rpc_call_dup, {
|
||||
"Duplicate Call", "rpc.call.dup", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "Duplicate Call", HFILL }},
|
||||
"Duplicate call to frame", "rpc.call.dup", FT_FRAMENUM, BASE_DEC,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "This is a duplicate to the call in frame", HFILL }},
|
||||
{ &hf_rpc_reply_dup, {
|
||||
"Duplicate Reply", "rpc.reply.dup", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "Duplicate Reply", HFILL }},
|
||||
"Duplicate reply to frame", "rpc.reply.dup", FT_FRAMENUM, BASE_DEC,
|
||||
NULL, 0, "This is a duplicate to the reply in frame", HFILL }},
|
||||
{ &hf_rpc_value_follows, {
|
||||
"Value Follows", "rpc.value_follows", FT_BOOLEAN, BASE_NONE,
|
||||
&yesno, 0, "Value Follows", HFILL }},
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue