Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Neels Hofmeyr bd5a1dc84f osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(): set T also for zero timeout
Before this patch, if timeout_secs == 0 was passed to
osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(), the previous T value remained set in the
osmo_fsm_inst->T.

For example:

  osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(fi, ST_X, 23, 42);
  // timer == 23 seconds; fi->T == 42
  osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(fi, ST_Y, 0, 0);
  // no timer; fi->T == 42!

Instead, always set to the T value passed to osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg().

Adjust osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg() API doc; need to rephrase to accurately
describe the otherwise unchanged behaviour independently from T.

Verify in fsm_test.c.

Rationale: it is confusing to have a T number remaining from some past state,
especially since the user explicitly passed a T number to
osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(). (Usually we are passing timeout_secs=0, T=0).

I first thought this behavior was introduced with
osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg_keep_timer(), but in fact osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg()
behaved this way from the start.

This shows up in the C test for the upcoming tdef API, where the test result
printout was showing some past T value sticking around after FSM state
transitions. After this patch, there will be no such confusion.

Change-Id: I65c7c262674a1bc5f37faeca6aa0320ab0174f3c
2019-01-29 10:25:26 +00:00
Harald Welte 136e73764e Add Finite State Machine abstraction code
This code is supposed to formalize some of the state machine handling in
Osmocom code.

Change-Id: I0b0965a912598c1f6b84042a99fea9d522642466
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/163
Tested-by: Jenkins Builder
Reviewed-by: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
2016-06-16 21:43:45 +00:00