The preferences are still supported for backwards compatibility, but the heuristic_protos file has final say on the "preference" to enable/disable a heuristic dissector.
Also add parameter to heur_dissector_add() for the "default" enable/disable of a heuristic dissector. With this parameter, a few more (presumably weak) heuristic dissectors have been "registered" but of course default to being disabled.
Change-Id: I51bebb2146ef3fbb8418d4f5c7f2cb2b58003a22
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/9610
Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Knall <rknall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hadriel Kaplan <hadrielk@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
This allows better presentation of heuristic dissectors to the end user.
Change-Id: I2ff3985ab914e83c2989880cc0c7b9904045b3f6
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/9602
Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
This allows dissector lists to be looked up by name, so they can be
shared by multiple dissectors.
(This means that there's no "udplite" heuristic dissector list, but
there shouldn't be one - protocols can run atop UDP or UDPLite equally
well, and they share a port namespace and uint dissector table, so they
should share a heuristic dissector table as well.)
Change-Id: Ifb2d2c294938c06d348a159adea7a57db8d770a7
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/5936
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
According to Microsoft documentation, valid values for the Version field are 2 and 3. Newer servers (like Windows 2012 R2) respond with Version=3.
Change-Id: Ifb0c6f52d09c75bbde2b4a46d13366461736b9c0
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3527
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
which can be used to call the found heuristic dissector on the next pass.
Introduce call_heur_dissector_direct() to be used to call a heuristic
dissector which accepted the frame on the first pass.
Change-Id: I524edd717b7d92b510bd60acfeea686d5f2b4582
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1697
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>