was done using textual search+replace, not anything syntax-aware, so presumably
it got most comments as well (except where there were typos).
Use a consistent coding style, and make proper use of the WS_DLL_* defines.
Group the functions appropriately in the header.
I ended up getting rid of most of the explanatory comments since many of them
duplicated what was in the value_string.c file (and were out of sync with the
recent updates I made to those in r48633). Presumably most of the comments
should be in the .h file not the .c file, but there's enough churn ahead that
it's not worth fixing yet.
Part of https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
svn path=/trunk/; revision=48634
be done on flows from one address to another; reassembly for protocols
running atop TCP should be done on flows from one TCP endpoint to
another.
We do this by:
adding "reassembly table" as a data structure;
associating hash tables for both in-progress reassemblies and
completed reassemblies with that data structure (currently, not
all reassemblies use the latter; they might keep completed
reassemblies in the first table);
having functions to create and destroy keys in that table;
offering standard routines for doing address-based and
address-and-port-based flow processing, so that dissectors not
needing their own specialized flow processing can just use them.
This fixes some mis-reassemblies of NIS YPSERV YPALL responses (where
the second YPALL response is processed as if it were a continuation of
a previous response between different endpoints, even though said
response is already reassembled), and also allows the DCE RPC-specific
stuff to be moved out of epan/reassembly.c into the DCE RPC dissector.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=48491
A detailed diagnostic information contains either a SMS-SUBMIT-REPORT or a SMS-DELIVERY-REPORT. Set P2P direction accordingly.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47927
epan/show_exception.c, as it's used outside
epan/dissectors/packet-frame.c. Update their callers to include
<epan/show_exception.h> to get their declaration.
Add a CATCH_NONFATAL_ERRORS macro that catches all exceptions that, if
there's more stuff in the packet to dissect after the dissector call
that threw the exception, doesn't mean you shouldn't go ahead and
dissect that stuff. Use it in all those cases, including ones where
BoundsError was inappropriately being caught (you want those passed up
to the top level, so that the packet is reported as having been cut
short in the capture process).
Add a CATCH_BOUNDS_ERRORS macro that catches all exceptions that
correspond to running past the end of the data for a tvbuff; use it
rather than explicitly catching those exceptions individually, and
rather than just catching all exceptions (the only place that
DissectorError should be caught, for example, is at the top level, so
dissector bugs show up in the protocol tree).
Don't catch and then immediately rethrow exceptions without doing
anything else; just let the exceptions go up to the final catcher.
Use show_exception() to report non-fatal errors, rather than doing it
yourself.
If a dissector is called from Lua, catch all non-fatal errors and use
show_exception() to report them rather than catching only
ReportedBoundsError and adding a proto_malformed item.
Don't catch exceptions when constructing a trailer tvbuff in
packet-ieee8023.c - just construct it after the payload has been
dissected, and let whatever exceptions that throws be handled at the top
level.
Avoid some TRY/CATCH/ENDTRY cases by using checks such as
tvb_bytes_exist() before even looking in the tvbuff.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47924
tvbuff and runs to the end of the tvbuff? Let me count the ways....
Replace a bunch of different ways of doing that (some incorrect, in that
they're not properly handling tvbuffs where the captured and reported
lengths are different) with tvb_new_subset_remaining().
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47751
Pascal Quantin