For:
- FT_BYTES: Always use just ENC_NA
- integral/floating (other than FT_[U]INT8): Do ENC_NA --> ENC_BIG_ENDIAN
Also:
- FT_UINT... --> FT_UINT8 in a few cases (to match proto_tree_add_item...)
- Change one case of incorrect '||' to '|'
Change-Id: I427e0e61618ff8faf55691c8a695930f67d455b0
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4184
Reviewed-by: Bill Meier <wmeier@newsguy.com>
Extract RFC3315 about hop-count :
20.1.2. Relaying a Message from a Relay Agent
If the message received by the relay agent is a Relay-forward message
and the hop-count in the message is greater than or equal to
HOP_COUNT_LIMIT, the relay agent discards the received message.
The relay agent copies the source address from the IP datagram in
which the message was received from the client into the peer-address
field in the Relay-forward message and sets the hop-count field to
the value of the hop-count field in the received message incremented
by 1.
Bug:10449
Change-Id: Ifb94e7c54c0a26714fc543862d4358d3e60c2676
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4017
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Extract RFC3315 about relay message and hop-count :
20.1.1. Relaying a Message from a Client
If the relay agent received the message to be relayed from a client,
the relay agent places a global or site-scoped address with a prefix
assigned to the link on which the client should be assigned an
address in the link-address field. This address will be used by the
server to determine the link from which the client should be assigned
an address and other configuration information. The hop-count in the
Relay-forward message is set to 0.
20.3. Construction of Relay-reply Messages
A server uses a Relay-reply message to return a response to a client
if the original message from the client was relayed to the server in
a Relay-forward message or to send a Reconfigure message to a client
if the server does not have an address it can use to send the message
directly to the client.
A response to the client MUST be relayed through the same relay
agents as the original client message. The server causes this to
happen by creating a Relay-reply message that includes a Relay
Message option containing the message for the next relay agent in the
return path to the client. The contained Relay-reply message
contains another Relay Message option to be sent to the next relay
agent, and so on. The server must record the contents of the
peer-address fields in the received message so it can construct the
appropriate Relay-reply message carrying the response from the
server.
For example, if client C sent a message that was relayed by relay
agent A to relay agent B and then to the server, the server would
send the following Relay-Reply message to relay agent B:
msg-type: RELAY-REPLY
hop-count: 1
link-address: 0
peer-address: A
Relay Message option, containing:
msg-type: RELAY-REPLY
hop-count: 0
link-address: address from link to which C is attached
peer-address: C
Relay Message option: <response from server>
Change-Id: I774cc22c9c090af1a5d3732115c7cd3478343288
Bug:10437
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3936
Petri-Dish: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I2ea1892b5963cc5578cbdd2b03029ca8424f2267
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/2640
Tested-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
The Interface-ID SHOULD be considered an opaque value, with policies
based on exact match only; that is, the Interface-ID SHOULD NOT be
internally parsed by the server.
This reverts the "Cable Lab specific" functionality added in SVN rev 32928, git rev a541950ca8.
bug:9877
Change-Id: Id4a8cbd01ab3cd6d5a0a44aa2066ea395190f51a
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1579
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Details:
- Use dhcpv6_domain() to handle dissection of certain FQDN fields:
+ OPTION_AFTR_NAME: Don't use get_dns_name(); It allows "compression"
which is not valid forthis field.
+ OPTION_CCCV6_IETF_PROV_SRV: Replace use of swap_field_length_with_char();
Fix bug which caused invalid "expert" message.
+ OPTION_CCCV6_KRB_REALM: Remove validation; replace use of swap_field_length_with_char().
- Allow filtering for each different FQDN field (rather than using a generic "dhcpv6.domain"
for the various FQDN fields).
- Fix some bugs in the display of the dissection for NTP_SERVER_OPTION;
- Add some "XXX ToDo" comments.
- Add some comments as the to specific RFC for certain options;
- Note that RFC 4075 is now "deprecated";
- CL-SP-CANN-DHCP-Reg: version I10 is the latest as Feb 2014.
Change-Id: I82edafb8293b71037b84629406ce609f9a835f04
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/257
Reviewed-by: Bill Meier <wmeier@newsguy.com>
Tested-by: Bill Meier <wmeier@newsguy.com>
obvious that the returned string is ephemeral, and opens up the original names
in the API for versions that take a wmem pool (and thus can work in any scope).
svn path=/trunk/; revision=54249
Now that "bytes consumed" can be determined, should tcp_dissect_pdus() take advantage of that?
Should tcp_dissect_pdus return length (bytes consumed)? There are many dissectors that just call tcp_dissect_pdus() then return tvb_length(tvb). Seems like that could all be rolled into one.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=53198
1. Case sensitivity differences between hf_ field name and formatted string.
2. Unnecessary whitespace between hf_ field name and colon in formatted string
There are cases where the hf_ field name doesn't quite match the proto_tree_add_uint_format, but it's close enough that one of them should be "right", I'm just not sure which is, I just know the string in proto_tree_add_uint_format is the one displayed.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=52098
The script didn't catch as many as I would have liked, but it's a start.
The most common (ab)use of proto_tree_add_uint_format was for appending strings to CRC/checksum values to note good or bad CRC/checksum.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=52045
Also (for a few files):
- create/use some extended value strings;
- remove unneeded #include files;
- remove unneeded variable initialization;
- re-order fcns slightly so prefs_reg_handoff...() at end, etc
svn path=/trunk/; revision=44438