This patch introduces new APIs to allow dissectors to have a preference for
a (TCP) port, but the underlying data is actually part of Decode As functionality.
For now the APIs are intentionally separate from the regular APIs that register a
dissector within a dissector table. It may be possible to eventually combine the
two so that all dissectors that register with a dissector table have an opportunity
to "automatically" have a preference to adjust the "table value" through the
preferences dialog.
The tcp.port dissector table was used as the guinea pig. This will eventually be
expanded to other dissector tables as well (most notably UDP ports). Some
dissectors that "shared" a TCP/UDP port preference were also converted. It also
removed the need for some preference callback functions (mostly when the callback
function was the proto_reg_handoff function) so there is cleanup around that.
Dissectors that has a port preference whose default was 0 were switched to using
the dissector_add_for_decode_as_with_preference API rather than dissector_add_uint_with_preference
Also added comments for TCP ports used that aren't IANA registered.
Change-Id: I99604f95d426ad345f4b494598d94178b886eb67
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/17724
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Have all dissector tables have a "supports Decode As" flag, which
defaults to FALSE, and which is set to TRUE if a register_decode_as()
refers to it.
When adding a dissector to a dissector table with a given key, only add
it for Decode As if the dissector table supports it.
For non-FT_STRING dissector tables, always check for multiple entries
for the same protocol with different dissectors, and report an error if
we found them.
This means there's no need for the creator of a dissector table to
specify whether duplicates of that sort should be allowed - we always do
the check when registering something for "Decode As" (in a non-FT_STRING
dissector table), and just don't bother registering anything for "Decode
As" if the dissector table doesn't support "Decode As", so there's no
check done for those dissector tables.
Change-Id: I4a1fdea3bddc2af27a65cfbca23edc99b26c0eed
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/17402
Petri-Dish: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
If an ASN.1 dissector is calling register_dissector for itself in its proto_register_xxx
function and then calling find_dissector for itself in its proto_reg_handoff_xxx
function then just create a static handle for that dissector and use the return
value of register_dissector, so the find isn't necessary.
Change-Id: I911bdadc2fb4259601c141b955e741a2369cc447
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/16233
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
This will make it easier to determine protocol dependencies.
Some LLC OUI dissector tables didn't have an associated protocol, so they were left without one (-1 used)
Change-Id: I6339f16476510ef3f393d6fb5d8946419bfb4b7d
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/14446
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Michael Mann