osmith
/
wireshark
forked from osmocom/wireshark
1
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

From Xiaoguang Liu 

In wireshark a NTP field is displayed as "clock dispersion". 
But should it be called "root dispersion" as per RFC 1305? 

svn path=/trunk/; revision=19705
This commit is contained in:
Jaap Keuter 2006-10-26 14:36:09 +00:00
parent c2c13fcecb
commit f7aa75ba22
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
epan/dissectors/packet-ntp.c
View File

@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ dissect_ntp_std(tvbuff_t *tvb, proto_tree *ntp_tree, guint8 flags)
(tvb_get_ntohs(tvb, 10) / 65536.0);
proto_tree_add_double_format(ntp_tree, hf_ntp_rootdispersion, tvb, 8, 4,
rootdispersion,
"Clock Dispersion: %9.4f sec",
"Root Dispersion: %9.4f sec",
rootdispersion);
/* Now, there is a problem with secondary servers. Standards
@ -846,8 +846,8 @@ proto_register_ntp(void)
"Root Delay", "ntp.rootdelay", FT_DOUBLE, BASE_DEC,
NULL, 0, "Root Delay", HFILL }},
{ &hf_ntp_rootdispersion, {
"Clock Dispersion", "ntp.rootdispersion", FT_DOUBLE, BASE_DEC,
NULL, 0, "Clock Dispersion", HFILL }},
"Root Dispersion", "ntp.rootdispersion", FT_DOUBLE, BASE_DEC,
NULL, 0, "Root Dispersion", HFILL }},
{ &hf_ntp_refid, {
"Reference Clock ID", "ntp.refid", FT_BYTES, BASE_NONE,
NULL, 0, "Reference Clock ID", HFILL }},