forked from osmocom/wireshark
asterix: wrong presentation of fields I009/080 in CAT009.
Fields I009/080 were wrongly represented for CAT009. 8 and 16 bit long fields were represented as 24 bit. Change-Id: I5bd1c1f006292f58d0290ced80dde22324cb4002 Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/24746 Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net> Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
abd703c4b8
commit
8cb9a094bf
|
@ -9049,9 +9049,9 @@ void proto_register_asterix (void)
|
|||
{ &hf_009_060_STEP, { "Step number", "asterix.009_060_STEP", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0xfc, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_070, { "070, Time of Day", "asterix.009_070", FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080, { "080, Processing Status", "asterix.009_080", FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_SCALE, { "Scaling factor", "asterix.009_080_SCALE", FT_UINT24, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0xf80000, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_R, { "R", "asterix.009_080_R", FT_UINT24, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x070000, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_Q, { "Q", "asterix.009_080_Q", FT_UINT24, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x00fffe, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_SCALE, { "Scaling factor", "asterix.009_080_SCALE", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0xf8, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_R, { "R", "asterix.009_080_R", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x07, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_080_Q, { "Q", "asterix.009_080_Q", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0xfffe, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_090, { "090, Radar Configuration and Status", "asterix.009_090", FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_090_CP, { "CP", "asterix.009_090_CP", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x10, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
{ &hf_009_090_WO, { "WO", "asterix.009_090_WO", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x08, NULL, HFILL } },
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue