Don't do canaries in blocks of guint32, it appears to cause alignment issues

when running tests on Solaris. Revert back to byte-at-a-time, but do fewer bytes
to avoid a performance hit.

svn path=/trunk/; revision=52617
This commit is contained in:
Evan Huus 2013-10-15 13:15:38 +00:00
parent 586dea0e04
commit 7d66e3806b
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
* possible.
*/
#define WMEM_CANARY_SIZE 4 /* in units of guint32 */
#define WMEM_CANARY_VALUE 0x8EE8D476
#define WMEM_CANARY_SIZE 4 /* in bytes */
#define WMEM_CANARY_VALUE 0x9E
#define WMEM_PREFILL 0xA1
#define WMEM_POSTFILL 0x1A
@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ typedef struct _wmem_strict_allocator_block_t {
/* Just the length of real_data, not counting the canaries */
gsize data_len;
guint32 *leading_canary;
guint8 *real_data;
guint32 *trailing_canary;
guint8 *leading_canary;
guint8 *real_data;
guint8 *trailing_canary;
} wmem_strict_allocator_block_t;
typedef struct _wmem_strict_allocator_t {
@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ wmem_strict_block_new(const size_t size)
block = wmem_new(NULL, wmem_strict_allocator_block_t);
block->data_len = size;
block->leading_canary = (guint32 *)wmem_alloc(NULL, block->data_len + (2 * sizeof(guint32) * WMEM_CANARY_SIZE));
block->real_data = (guint8 *)(block->leading_canary + WMEM_CANARY_SIZE);
block->trailing_canary = (guint32 *)(block->real_data + block->data_len);
block->leading_canary = (guint8 *)wmem_alloc(NULL, block->data_len + (2 * WMEM_CANARY_SIZE));
block->real_data = block->leading_canary + WMEM_CANARY_SIZE;
block->trailing_canary = block->real_data + block->data_len;
memset(block->real_data, WMEM_PREFILL, block->data_len);
memset(block->real_data, WMEM_PREFILL, block->data_len);
for (i=0; i<WMEM_CANARY_SIZE; i++) {
block->leading_canary[i] = WMEM_CANARY_VALUE;
block->trailing_canary[i] = WMEM_CANARY_VALUE;