From 53d2b882798d163c63f22a1267349a871a4442af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ronnie Sahlberg Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:58:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] technically speaking rpc duplicate replies are not retransmissions only the request is tecnically a restransmission the reply is technically not a retransmission (since it is a new reply to the retransmitted request) mark duplicated replies as RPC duplicate ... instead of as RPC retransmission thanks to Cal for pointing this out. svn path=/trunk/; revision=10725 --- packet-rpc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/packet-rpc.c b/packet-rpc.c index d7b5e85121..b23d366f28 100644 --- a/packet-rpc.c +++ b/packet-rpc.c @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ * Routines for rpc dissection * Copyright 1999, Uwe Girlich * - * $Id: packet-rpc.c,v 1.143 2004/04/07 03:57:34 sahlberg Exp $ + * $Id: packet-rpc.c,v 1.144 2004/04/29 11:58:00 sahlberg Exp $ * * Ethereal - Network traffic analyzer * By Gerald Combs @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ dissect_rpc_message(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, Mark it as such. */ if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO)) { col_prepend_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO, - "[RPC retransmission of #%d]", rpc_call->rep_num); + "[RPC duplicate of #%d]", rpc_call->rep_num); } proto_tree_add_item(rpc_tree, hf_rpc_dup, tvb, 0,0, TRUE);