forked from osmocom/wireshark
See if this makes MSVC happy.
It's complaining about an "overflow in constant arithmetic". Neither INFINITY nor NAN are specified by C90; C99 specifies that they are both floats. Until recently, Microsoft had no interest in C99; if the version we're using supports C99's INFINITY and NAN, it should be OK to assign them to a variable (no "arithmetic" involved), so I'm guessing that the "arithmetic" in question is the use of conditional operators ? and :, so I'm writing it as an if statement instead. Change-Id: I532b9b5943be32e0897e4f03ac4e625ac41ee63b Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/10215 Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b9a628e54
commit
4f68c52eda
|
@ -571,8 +571,12 @@ static float decode_half(const int half) {
|
|||
val = ldexpf((float)mantissa, -24);
|
||||
else if (exponent != 31)
|
||||
val = ldexpf((float)(mantissa + 1024), exponent - 25);
|
||||
else
|
||||
val = mantissa == 0 ? INFINITY : NAN;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (mantissa == 0)
|
||||
val = INFINITY;
|
||||
else
|
||||
val = NAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return half & 0x8000 ? -val : val;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue