forked from osmocom/wireshark
Snort: Try to address confusion from issue 17062.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a0e4220c3
commit
403fdbe1a0
|
@ -1315,6 +1315,12 @@ static void snort_start(void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef _WIN32
|
||||
report_failure("Snort dissector: not yet able to launch Snort process under Windows");
|
||||
current_session.working = FALSE;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Create snort process and set up pipes */
|
||||
snort_debug_printf("\nRunning %s with config file %s\n", pref_snort_binary_filename, pref_snort_config_filename);
|
||||
if (!g_spawn_async_with_pipes(NULL, /* working_directory */
|
||||
|
@ -1536,7 +1542,7 @@ proto_register_snort(void)
|
|||
|
||||
prefs_register_enum_preference(snort_module, "alerts_source",
|
||||
"Source of Snort alerts",
|
||||
"Set whether dissector should run Snort itself or use user packet comments",
|
||||
"Set whether dissector should run Snort and pass frames into it, or read alerts from user packet comments",
|
||||
&pref_snort_alerts_source, alerts_source_vals, FALSE);
|
||||
|
||||
prefs_register_filename_preference(snort_module, "binary",
|
||||
|
@ -1559,7 +1565,7 @@ proto_register_snort(void)
|
|||
&snort_show_alert_expert_info);
|
||||
prefs_register_bool_preference(snort_module, "show_alert_in_reassembled_frame",
|
||||
"Try to show alerts in reassembled frame",
|
||||
"Attempt to show alert in reassembled frame where possible",
|
||||
"Attempt to show alert in reassembled frame where possible. Note that this won't work during live capture",
|
||||
&snort_alert_in_reassembled_frame);
|
||||
|
||||
snort_handle = create_dissector_handle(snort_dissector, proto_snort);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue