forked from osmocom/wireshark
Some more work related to bug #8979 and previous commit
- Make http.location[0:4] == lower(http.location) behave the same as lower(http.location) == http.location[0:4] - fix compiler errors + comments svn path=/trunk/; revision=50950
This commit is contained in:
parent
da170f1d04
commit
1f4d76a6ca
|
@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ check_drange_node_sanity(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
|
|||
start_offset = drange_node_get_start_offset(drnode);
|
||||
entity = sttype_range_entity(args->st);
|
||||
if (entity && stnode_type_id(entity) == STTYPE_FIELD) {
|
||||
hfinfo = stnode_data(entity);
|
||||
hfinfo = (header_field_info *)stnode_data(entity);
|
||||
|
||||
dfilter_fail("Range %d:%d specified for \"%s\" isn't valid, "
|
||||
"as length %d isn't positive",
|
||||
|
@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ check_drange_node_sanity(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
|
|||
args->err = TRUE;
|
||||
entity = sttype_range_entity(args->st);
|
||||
if (entity && stnode_type_id(entity) == STTYPE_FIELD) {
|
||||
hfinfo = stnode_data(entity);
|
||||
hfinfo = (header_field_info *)stnode_data(entity);
|
||||
|
||||
dfilter_fail("Range %d-%d specified for \"%s\" isn't valid, "
|
||||
"as %d is greater than %d",
|
||||
|
@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ check_relation_LHS_FIELD(const char *relation_string, FtypeCanFunc can_func,
|
|||
rn = drange_node_new();
|
||||
drange_node_set_start_offset(rn, 0);
|
||||
drange_node_set_to_the_end(rn);
|
||||
/* st_arg1 is freed in this step */
|
||||
/* new_st is owner of st_arg1 in this step */
|
||||
sttype_range_set1(new_st, st_arg1, rn);
|
||||
|
||||
sttype_test_set2_args(st_node, new_st, st_arg2);
|
||||
|
@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ check_relation_LHS_RANGE(const char *relation_string, FtypeCanFunc can_func _U_,
|
|||
type2 = stnode_type_id(st_arg2);
|
||||
entity1 = sttype_range_entity(st_arg1);
|
||||
if (entity1 && stnode_type_id(entity1) == STTYPE_FIELD) {
|
||||
hfinfo1 = stnode_data(entity1);
|
||||
hfinfo1 = (header_field_info *)stnode_data(entity1);
|
||||
ftype1 = hfinfo1->type;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ftype_can_slice(ftype1)) {
|
||||
|
@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ check_relation_LHS_RANGE(const char *relation_string, FtypeCanFunc can_func _U_,
|
|||
rn = drange_node_new();
|
||||
drange_node_set_start_offset(rn, 0);
|
||||
drange_node_set_to_the_end(rn);
|
||||
/* st_arg2 is freed in this step */
|
||||
/* new_st is owner of st_arg2 in this step */
|
||||
sttype_range_set1(new_st, st_arg2, rn);
|
||||
|
||||
sttype_test_set2_args(st_node, st_arg1, new_st);
|
||||
|
@ -974,7 +974,16 @@ check_relation_LHS_RANGE(const char *relation_string, FtypeCanFunc can_func _U_,
|
|||
THROW(TypeError);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX should I add a new drange node? */
|
||||
/* Convert entire field to bytes */
|
||||
new_st = stnode_new(STTYPE_RANGE, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
rn = drange_node_new();
|
||||
drange_node_set_start_offset(rn, 0);
|
||||
drange_node_set_to_the_end(rn);
|
||||
/* new_st is owner of st_arg2 in this step */
|
||||
sttype_range_set1(new_st, st_arg2, rn);
|
||||
|
||||
sttype_test_set2_args(st_node, st_arg1, new_st);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
check_function(st_arg2);
|
||||
|
@ -1109,7 +1118,7 @@ check_relation_LHS_FUNCTION(const char *relation_string, FtypeCanFunc can_func,
|
|||
rn = drange_node_new();
|
||||
drange_node_set_start_offset(rn, 0);
|
||||
drange_node_set_to_the_end(rn);
|
||||
/* st_arg1 is freed in this step */
|
||||
/* new_st is owner of st_arg1 in this step */
|
||||
sttype_range_set1(new_st, st_arg1, rn);
|
||||
|
||||
sttype_test_set2_args(st_node, new_st, st_arg2);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue