We usually have a local IP already via ike_sa_t::resolve_hosts() before
build_i() is called but if that's not the case, it's more likely we have
one after we processed the first response (it might also have changed).
There is a potential chance we still don't have one if the socket API
doesn't provide us with the destination address of received messages,
but that seems not very likely nowadays.
We need the PSK/identity already when deriving the keys in process_i().
Fixes: 1665a4e050 ("ikev1: Use actual local identity as initiator or aggressive mode responder")
Charon refuses to make use of algorithms IDs from the private space
for unknown peer implementations [1]. If you chose to ignore and violate
that section of the RFC since you *know* your peers *must* support those
private IDs, there's no way to disable that behavior.
With this commit a strongswan.conf option is introduced which allows to
deliberately ignore parts of section 3.12 from the standard.
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7296#section-3.12
Signed-off-by: Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com>
Previously, we simply used the lifetimes of the first
proposal/transform, which is not correct if the initiator uses different
lifetimes in its proposals/transforms.
This avoids having to call strip_dh() in child_cfg_t::get_proposals().
It also inverts the ALLOW_PRIVATE flag (i.e. makes it SKIP_PRIVATE) so
nothing has to be supplied to clone complete proposals.
During proposal selection with ike/child_cfgs a couple of boolean
variables can be set (e.g. private, prefer_self, strip_dh). To simplify
the addition of new parameters, these functions now use a set of flags
instead of indiviual boolean values.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com>
The payload we sent before is not compliant with RFC 2407 and thus some
peers might abort negotiation (e.g. with an INVALID-PROTOCOL-ID error).
Fixes#819.
We currently send the notify in Main Mode only, as it is explicitly not allowed
by RFC 2407 to send (unprotected) notifications in Aggressive Mode. To make
that work, we'd need to handle that notify in Aggressive Mode, which could
allow a MitM to inject such notifies and do some harm.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com>
When an initiator starts reauthentication on a connection that uses push
mode to assign a virtual IP, we can't execute the Mode Config before releasing
the virtual IP. Otherwise we would request a new and different lease, which
the client probably can't handle. Defer Mode Config execution, so the same IP
gets first released then reassigned during reauthentication.
Tobias Brunner