So that the navigation pane works correctly in browsers.
Some additional doc fixes put in where found (but many more still to go).
Added some dummy .c and .h files to bring the associated docs into line.
makefile changed to allow 'make html' as well as 'make doc' (the latter only does html anyway).
This converts all the YAML files to JSON files, as json parsing is built
into python instead of being a separate library requiring installation.
YAML is a superset of JSON, but putting comments in is not quite as obvious
as it is in yaml.
The following glue was used to convert yaml to json:
python -c 'import sys, yaml, json; json.dump(yaml.load(sys.stdin), sys.stdout, indent=4)' < $1 > $2
Clearly I haven't tested this on every single platform, and this
doesn't address the large blobs of yaml in the lpc4300 scripts directory,
only the cortex NVIC generation process.
I've tested a few IRQ driven example apps, and I've checked the generated
output of some known cases like the LM3s that has explicit gaps, and they are
all generated correctly.
The value '6' was twice in the table and all higher frequencies are
shifted. The values are now fitting the table in 'STM32F05xxx/06xxx advanced
ARM-based 32-bit MCUs', page 101.
PLL frequencies have been measured by selecting
rcc_set_mco(RCC_CFGR_MCO_SYSCLK);
and measuring the output with an oscilloscope. 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 MHz
work fine from the HSI base.
Add memorymap entries for ST calibration data, the vref internal, and the temp
sensor at 30C and 110C for the parts that provide this data.
F1 and F2 do not appear to have this anywhere.
According to RM0090, page 301, paragraph 11.13.12 Note. (For F4, for F1 and F3 is it in the corresponding manuals)
The JSQR are filled always ending at SQR4 ie for those lists we must set this list:
(A) -> JSQ4 = A,
(A,B) -> JSQ3 = A, JSQ4 = B,
(A,B,C) -> JSQ2 = A, JSQ3 = B, JSQ4 = C,
(A,B,C,D) -> JSQ1 = A, JSQ2 = B, JSQ3 = C, JSQ4 = D,
The readed values are in correct order, starting from JDR1:
(A) -> JDR1 = A,
(A,B) -> JDR1 = A, JDR2 = B,
(A,B,C) -> JDR1 = A, JDR2 = B, JDR3 = C,
(A,B,C,D) -> JDR1 = A, JDR2 = B, JDR3 = C, JDR4 = D,
The common code wasn't being included in L1 builds, even though the headers now
included the correct definitions.
This combines the two f0 and f3 spi files, which previously differed only in
the number of spi peripherals defined.
Files were renamed to the full "l1f124" style, not because I like it, but
because it's the convention we have, so it's best to apply it rigourously.
Tested on L1 and F100 boards, compile tested only for others, but the examples
repository all compiles too. (Though the lack of SPI examples for all
platforms was how this broke in the first place)
DFF exists at bit 11 for f1, f2, f4 and l1, but the f0 and f3 have that bit as
CRC len and use CR2 for data size bits instead. The merging of the F3 and F0
and attempts to put common data in common places broke the l1 code.
F3 and F0 SPI headers are still almost completely identical.
STM32L1 has a different set of offsets, not just a different base
address, so we can't have common registers definitions. Also, out of
F0,F1,F2,F3,F4,L1, only the F1 has the odd note about 2x16bit registers
and 2x32bit registers with one 16bit register marked as "This field
value is also reserved for a future feature." Therefore, replace the
awkward reading out as multiple words and just copy them in.
F0,F2,F3,F4 were missing definitions altogether.
This does _not_ attempt to address the problem of the mismatched base
addresses for Medium+ and High Density L1 parts.
We don't support f0 yet so let's not fool anyone. We may rename those
files back again if when we cross check that it is actually true this
file supports f0.
Ken Sarkies