![]() Comparing the layouts of struct detail_pixel_timing with x.org's struct detailed_timings and how those are handled, it appears that the hsync_positive and vsync_positive fields are backwards. This patch fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20019 for me. It was tested on 2 monitors, LG FLATRON L225WS 22" and a YAKUMO 17" for which more details are unknown. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
drm.h | ||
drm_core.h | ||
drm_crtc.h | ||
drm_crtc_helper.h | ||
drm_edid.h | ||
drm_hashtab.h | ||
drm_memory.h | ||
drm_memory_debug.h | ||
drm_mode.h | ||
drm_os_linux.h | ||
drm_pciids.h | ||
drm_sarea.h | ||
drm_sman.h | ||
drmP.h | ||
i810_drm.h | ||
i830_drm.h | ||
i915_drm.h | ||
Kbuild | ||
mga_drm.h | ||
r128_drm.h | ||
radeon_drm.h | ||
savage_drm.h | ||
sis_drm.h | ||
via_drm.h |