![]() I have tested PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS and PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS on umview. I do not understand why historically these tags has been defined as PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS and PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS instead of simply PTRACE_[GS]ETREGS. The other "originality" is that the address must be put into the "addr" field instead of the "data" field as stated in the manual. Signed-off-by: renzo davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arm | ||
arm26 | ||
cris | ||
frv | ||
h8300 | ||
i386 | ||
ia64 | ||
m32r | ||
m68k | ||
m68knommu | ||
mips | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
ppc | ||
s390 | ||
sh | ||
sh64 | ||
sparc | ||
sparc64 | ||
um | ||
v850 | ||
x86_64 | ||
xtensa |