![]() [ There's some not quite baked bits in cpufreq-git right now so sending this on as a patch instead ] On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:58 -0700, Tom London wrote: > After installing .2356 I get this each time I boot: > ======================================================= > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > ------------------------------------------------------- > S06cpuspeed/1620 is trying to acquire lock: > (dbs_mutex){--..}, at: [<c060d6bb>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 > > but task is already holding lock: > (cpucontrol){--..}, at: [<c060d6bb>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > make sure the cpu hotplug recursive mutex (yuck) is taken early in the cpufreq codepaths to avoid a AB-BA deadlock. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cpufreq.c | ||
cpufreq_conservative.c | ||
cpufreq_ondemand.c | ||
cpufreq_performance.c | ||
cpufreq_powersave.c | ||
cpufreq_stats.c | ||
cpufreq_userspace.c | ||
freq_table.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile |