linux-2.6

dect/linux-2.6

Archived

Fork 0

Commit graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jesper Juhl	986a80d5c1	[PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc() warning when building with gcc -W : include/linux/efi.h: In function `efi_range_is_wc': include/linux/efi.h:320: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned It looks to me like a significantly large 'len' passed in could cause the loop to never end. Isn't it safer to make 'i' an unsigned long as well? Like this little patch below (which of course also kills the warning) : Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>	2005-06-16 16:27:14 -07:00
Linus Torvalds	1da177e4c3	Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!	2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Jesper Juhl

986a80d5c1

[PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()

warning when building with gcc -W : 

 include/linux/efi.h: In function `efi_range_is_wc':
 include/linux/efi.h:320: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned

It looks to me like a significantly large 'len' passed in could cause the 
loop to never end. Isn't it safer to make 'i' an unsigned long as well? 
Like this little patch below (which of course also kills the warning) :

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

2005-06-16 16:27:14 -07:00

Linus Torvalds

1da177e4c3

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

2 commits