This isn't ideal as we could do with deferring the power on a lot more on
Oaktrail and Medfield. We can't however do that without fixing other things
first.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Initial changes to get backlight behaviour we want and to fix backlight crashes
on suspend/resume paths.
[Note: on some boxes this will now produce a warning about the backlight, this
isn't a regression it's an unfixed but non harmful case I still need to nail]
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
PCI core only prefer one of legacy PM and new PM. And since runtime pm
is implemented, which requires the new PM method, we should remove the
legacy PM method.
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
At this point we now have the file naming making somewhat more sense
although the dependancies are not as clean as would be ideal
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
In particular don't destroy static mutexes, it upsets things
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
We really want to move towards a completely abstracted interface rather
than having tons of per chip junk in the same files.
Begin with the power code which is probably the worst offender. Add a set
of methods, initialise a dev_priv->ops pointer and rip the chip specifics
out of the power code. While we are it pick up the display init bits.
So we know it's now chip specifics clean remove the psb_ naming from it.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
