dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

perf: Fix signed comparison in perf_adjust_period() 

Frederic reported that frequency driven swevents didn't work properly
and even caused a division-by-zero error.

It turns out there are two bugs, the division-by-zero comes from a
failure to deal with that in perf_calculate_period().

The other was more interesting and turned out to be a wrong comparison
in perf_adjust_period(). The comparison was between an s64 and u64 and
got implicitly converted to an unsigned comparison. The problem is
that period_left is typically < 0, so it ended up being always true.

Cure this by making the local period variables s64.

Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2010-06-04 15:18:01 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 58cc1a9e3b
commit f6ab91add6
1 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
kernel/perf_event.c
View File

@ -1507,6 +1507,9 @@ do { \
divisor = nsec * frequency;
}
if (!divisor)
return dividend;
return div64_u64(dividend, divisor);
}
@ -1529,7 +1532,7 @@ static int perf_event_start(struct perf_event *event)
static void perf_adjust_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
u64 period, sample_period;
s64 period, sample_period;
s64 delta;
period = perf_calculate_period(event, nsec, count);