RDMA/addr: Use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() in queue_req()
In queue_req(), use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() for following reasons : - Improves insert time if multiple entries with same time are present. - set_timeout need not be called if entry with same time is added to the list (and that happens to be the entry with the smallest time), saving atomic/locking operations. - Earlier entries with same time are deleted first (fifo). Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4022274cf
commit
f115db4803
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void queue_req(struct addr_req *req)
|
|||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_reverse(temp_req, &req_list, list) {
|
||||
if (time_after(req->timeout, temp_req->timeout))
|
||||
if (time_after_eq(req->timeout, temp_req->timeout))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue