dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0

cifs: fix inode leak in cifs_get_inode_info_unix

Try this:

    mount a share with unix extensions
    create a file on it
    umount the share

You'll get the following message in the ring buffer:

VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of cifs. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a
nice day...

...the problem is that cifs_get_inode_info_unix is creating and hashing
a new inode even when it's going to return error anyway. The first
lookup when creating a file returns an error so we end up leaking this
inode before we do the actual create. This appears to be a regression
caused by commit 0e4bbde94f.

The following patch seems to fix it for me, and fixes a minor
formatting nit as well.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Layton 2008-07-12 13:47:59 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent d3297a644a
commit e911d0cc87
1 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -219,15 +219,15 @@ int cifs_get_inode_info_unix(struct inode **pinode,
rc = CIFSSMBUnixQPathInfo(xid, pTcon, full_path, &find_data,
cifs_sb->local_nls, cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags &
CIFS_MOUNT_MAP_SPECIAL_CHR);
if (rc) {
if (rc == -EREMOTE && !is_dfs_referral) {
is_dfs_referral = true;
cFYI(DBG2, ("DFS ref"));
/* for DFS, server does not give us real inode data */
fill_fake_finddataunix(&find_data, sb);
rc = 0;
}
}
if (rc == -EREMOTE && !is_dfs_referral) {
is_dfs_referral = true;
cFYI(DBG2, ("DFS ref"));
/* for DFS, server does not give us real inode data */
fill_fake_finddataunix(&find_data, sb);
rc = 0;
} else if (rc)
goto cgiiu_exit;
num_of_bytes = le64_to_cpu(find_data.NumOfBytes);
end_of_file = le64_to_cpu(find_data.EndOfFile);
@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int cifs_get_inode_info_unix(struct inode **pinode,
*pinode = new_inode(sb);
if (*pinode == NULL) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto cgiiu_exit;
goto cgiiu_exit;
}
/* Is an i_ino of zero legal? */
/* note ino incremented to unique num in new_inode */