dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Bluetooth: Add missing lock nesting notation 

This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm
connections:

[  228.165378] =============================================
[  228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4 #120 Tainted: G        W
[  228.165378] ---------------------------------------------
[  228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0000aa0>] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] but task is already holding lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0205118>] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] other info that might help us debug this:
[  228.165378]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]        CPU0
[  228.165378]        ----
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo Padovan 2012-11-20 23:25:54 -02:00
parent 2b2fec4d08
commit dc2a0e20fb
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
View File

@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f
long timeo;
int err = 0;
lock_sock(sk);
lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) {
err = -EINVAL;
@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f
release_sock(sk);
timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
lock_sock(sk);
lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);