From d8b79b2f94600262fcfbffbe3df7fd3c83c6c51b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:02:58 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: use _safe() version of list_for_each This is calling list_del() inside a loop which is a problem when we try move to the next item on the list. I've converted it to use the _safe version. And also, as a cleanup, I've converted it to use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c index 6cc046d3681..f42e4060b39 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c @@ -173,10 +173,9 @@ out: static void destroy_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head) { - struct list_head *this; - struct fsync_inode_entry *entry; - list_for_each(this, head) { - entry = list_entry(this, struct fsync_inode_entry, list); + struct fsync_inode_entry *entry, *tmp; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, head, list) { iput(entry->inode); list_del(&entry->list); kmem_cache_free(fsync_entry_slab, entry);