dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Btrfs: detect wether a device supports discard 

We have a problem where if a user specifies discard but doesn't actually support
it we will return EOPNOTSUPP from btrfs_discard_extent.  This is a problem
because this gets called (in a fashion) from the tree log recovery code, which
has a nice little BUG_ON(ret) after it, which causes us to fail the tree log
replay.  So instead detect wether our devices support discard when we're adding
them and then don't issue discards if we know that the device doesn't support
it.  And just for good measure set ret = 0 in btrfs_issue_discard just in case
we still get EOPNOTSUPP so we don't screw anybody up like this again.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Josef Bacik 2011-08-04 14:52:27 +00:00 committed by Chris Mason
parent 2ab1ba68ae
commit d5e2003c2b
3 changed files with 29 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
View File

@ -1782,6 +1782,9 @@ static int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
for (i = 0; i < multi->num_stripes; i++, stripe++) {
if (!stripe->dev->can_discard)
continue;
ret = btrfs_issue_discard(stripe->dev->bdev,
stripe->physical,
stripe->length);
@ -1789,11 +1792,16 @@ static int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
discarded_bytes += stripe->length;
else if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
break;
/*
* Just in case we get back EOPNOTSUPP for some reason,
* just ignore the return value so we don't screw up
* people calling discard_extent.
*/
ret = 0;
}
kfree(multi);
}
if (discarded_bytes && ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = 0;
if (actual_bytes)
*actual_bytes = discarded_bytes;

17
fs/btrfs/volumes.c
View File

@ -517,6 +517,9 @@ static int __btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
fs_devices->rw_devices--;
}
if (device->can_discard)
fs_devices->num_can_discard--;
new_device = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_device), GFP_NOFS);
BUG_ON(!new_device);
memcpy(new_device, device, sizeof(*new_device));
@ -525,6 +528,7 @@ static int __btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
new_device->bdev = NULL;
new_device->writeable = 0;
new_device->in_fs_metadata = 0;
new_device->can_discard = 0;
list_replace_rcu(&device->dev_list, &new_device->dev_list);
call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
@ -564,6 +568,7 @@ int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
static int __btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
fmode_t flags, void *holder)
{
struct request_queue *q;
struct block_device *bdev;
struct list_head *head = &fs_devices->devices;
struct btrfs_device *device;
@ -620,6 +625,12 @@ static int __btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
seeding = 0;
}
q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
if (blk_queue_discard(q)) {
device->can_discard = 1;
fs_devices->num_can_discard++;
}
device->bdev = bdev;
device->in_fs_metadata = 0;
device->mode = flags;
@ -1560,6 +1571,7 @@ error:
int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
{
struct request_queue *q;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_device *device;
struct block_device *bdev;
@ -1629,6 +1641,9 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
lock_chunks(root);
q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
if (blk_queue_discard(q))
device->can_discard = 1;
device->writeable = 1;
device->work.func = pending_bios_fn;
generate_random_uuid(device->uuid);
@ -1664,6 +1679,8 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices++;
root->fs_info->fs_devices->open_devices++;
root->fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices++;
if (device->can_discard)
root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_can_discard++;
root->fs_info->fs_devices->total_rw_bytes += device->total_bytes;
if (!blk_queue_nonrot(bdev_get_queue(bdev)))

2
fs/btrfs/volumes.h
View File

@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct btrfs_device {
int writeable;
int in_fs_metadata;
int missing;
int can_discard;
spinlock_t io_lock;
@ -104,6 +105,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_devices {
u64 rw_devices;
u64 missing_devices;
u64 total_rw_bytes;
u64 num_can_discard;
struct block_device *latest_bdev;
/* all of the devices in the FS, protected by a mutex