Archived
14
0
Fork 0

RDMA/addr: Fix some cancellation problems in process_req()

Fix following problems in process_req() relating to cancellation:

- Function is wrongly doing another addr_remote() when cancelled,
  which is not required.
- Make failure reporting immediate by using time_after_eq().
- On cancellation, -ETIMEDOUT was returned to the callback routine
  instead of the more appropriate -ECANCELLED (users getting notified
  may want to print/return this status, eg ucma_event_handler).

Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
This commit is contained in:
Krishna Kumar 2006-11-24 16:02:34 +05:30 committed by Roland Dreier
parent c9edea298e
commit c78bb8442b

View file

@ -225,17 +225,16 @@ static void process_req(void *data)
mutex_lock(&lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, temp_req, &req_list, list) {
if (req->status) {
if (req->status == -ENODATA) {
src_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) &req->src_addr;
dst_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) &req->dst_addr;
req->status = addr_resolve_remote(src_in, dst_in,
req->addr);
if (req->status && time_after_eq(jiffies, req->timeout))
req->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
else if (req->status == -ENODATA)
continue;
}
if (req->status && time_after(jiffies, req->timeout))
req->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
else if (req->status == -ENODATA)
continue;
list_del(&req->list);
list_add_tail(&req->list, &done_list);
}