diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c index 6ca7acad7c5..12c07e8fd69 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c @@ -2104,19 +2104,6 @@ static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader) /* prevent changes to the threadgroup list while we take a snapshot. */ read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - if (!thread_group_leader(leader)) { - /* - * a race with de_thread from another thread's exec() may strip - * us of our leadership, making while_each_thread unsafe to use - * on this task. if this happens, there is no choice but to - * throw this task away and try again (from cgroup_procs_write); - * this is "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking". - */ - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - retval = -EAGAIN; - goto out_free_group_list; - } - tsk = leader; i = 0; do { @@ -2245,22 +2232,14 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup) if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp)) return -ENODEV; +retry_find_task: + rcu_read_lock(); if (pid) { - rcu_read_lock(); tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid); if (!tsk) { rcu_read_unlock(); - cgroup_unlock(); - return -ESRCH; - } - if (threadgroup) { - /* - * RCU protects this access, since tsk was found in the - * tid map. a race with de_thread may cause group_leader - * to stop being the leader, but cgroup_attach_proc will - * detect it later. - */ - tsk = tsk->group_leader; + ret= -ESRCH; + goto out_unlock_cgroup; } /* * even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we @@ -2271,29 +2250,38 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup) cred->euid != tcred->uid && cred->euid != tcred->suid) { rcu_read_unlock(); - cgroup_unlock(); - return -EACCES; + ret = -EACCES; + goto out_unlock_cgroup; } - get_task_struct(tsk); - rcu_read_unlock(); - } else { - if (threadgroup) - tsk = current->group_leader; - else - tsk = current; - get_task_struct(tsk); - } - - threadgroup_lock(tsk); + } else + tsk = current; if (threadgroup) - ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk); - else - ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk); + tsk = tsk->group_leader; + get_task_struct(tsk); + rcu_read_unlock(); + threadgroup_lock(tsk); + if (threadgroup) { + if (!thread_group_leader(tsk)) { + /* + * a race with de_thread from another thread's exec() + * may strip us of our leadership, if this happens, + * there is no choice but to throw this task away and + * try again; this is + * "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking". + */ + threadgroup_unlock(tsk); + put_task_struct(tsk); + goto retry_find_task; + } + ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk); + } else + ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk); threadgroup_unlock(tsk); put_task_struct(tsk); +out_unlock_cgroup: cgroup_unlock(); return ret; } @@ -2305,16 +2293,7 @@ static int cgroup_tasks_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 pid) static int cgroup_procs_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 tgid) { - int ret; - do { - /* - * attach_proc fails with -EAGAIN if threadgroup leadership - * changes in the middle of the operation, in which case we need - * to find the task_struct for the new leader and start over. - */ - ret = attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true); - } while (ret == -EAGAIN); - return ret; + return attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true); } /**