dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0

ocfs2: return -EAGAIN instead of EAGAIN in dlm

We used to return positive EAGAIN to indicate a retry action
is needed in dlm_begin_reco_handler(). Now we return negative
-EAGAIN to erase the confusion caused by this error code.

Signed-off-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tiger Yang 2009-11-19 10:17:46 +08:00 committed by Joel Becker
parent f6656d26d1
commit aad1b15310
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -2589,6 +2589,14 @@ retry:
"begin reco msg (%d)\n", dlm->name, nodenum, ret);
ret = 0;
}
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
mlog(0, "%s: trying to start recovery of node "
"%u, but node %u is waiting for last recovery "
"to complete, backoff for a bit\n", dlm->name,
dead_node, nodenum);
msleep(100);
goto retry;
}
if (ret < 0) {
struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
/* this is now a serious problem, possibly ENOMEM
@ -2608,14 +2616,6 @@ retry:
* another ENOMEM */
msleep(100);
goto retry;
} else if (ret == EAGAIN) {
mlog(0, "%s: trying to start recovery of node "
"%u, but node %u is waiting for last recovery "
"to complete, backoff for a bit\n", dlm->name,
dead_node, nodenum);
/* TODO Look into replacing msleep with cond_resched() */
msleep(100);
goto retry;
}
}
@ -2639,7 +2639,7 @@ int dlm_begin_reco_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
dlm->name, br->node_idx, br->dead_node,
dlm->reco.dead_node, dlm->reco.new_master);
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
return EAGAIN;
return -EAGAIN;
}
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);