dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0

Reinstate ZERO_PAGE optimization in 'get_user_pages()' and fix XIP

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki and Oleg Nesterov point out that since the commit
557ed1fa26 ("remove ZERO_PAGE") removed
the ZERO_PAGE from the VM mappings, any users of get_user_pages() will
generally now populate the VM with real empty pages needlessly.

We used to get the ZERO_PAGE when we did the "handle_mm_fault()", but
since fault handling no longer uses ZERO_PAGE for new anonymous pages,
we now need to handle that special case in follow_page() instead.

In particular, the removal of ZERO_PAGE effectively removed the core
file writing optimization where we would skip writing pages that had not
been populated at all, and increased memory pressure a lot by allocating
all those useless newly zeroed pages.

This reinstates the optimization by making the unmapped PTE case the
same as for a non-existent page table, which already did this correctly.

While at it, this also fixes the XIP case for follow_page(), where the
caller could not differentiate between the case of a page that simply
could not be used (because it had no "struct page" associated with it)
and a page that just wasn't mapped.

We do that by simply returning an error pointer for pages that could not
be turned into a "struct page *".  The error is arbitrarily picked to be
EFAULT, since that was what get_user_pages() already used for the
equivalent IO-mapped page case.

[ Also removed an impossible test for pte_offset_map_lock() failing:
  that's not how that function works ]

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2008-06-20 11:18:25 -07:00
parent 9bedbcb207
commit 89f5b7da2a
3 changed files with 24 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void dump_one_vdso_page(struct page *pg, struct page *upg)
printk("kpg: %p (c:%d,f:%08lx)", __va(page_to_pfn(pg) << PAGE_SHIFT),
page_count(pg),
pg->flags);
if (upg/* && pg != upg*/) {
if (upg && !IS_ERR(upg) /* && pg != upg*/) {
printk(" upg: %p (c:%d,f:%08lx)", __va(page_to_pfn(upg)
<< PAGE_SHIFT),
page_count(upg),

View File

@ -999,17 +999,15 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
goto no_page_table;
ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
if (!ptep)
goto out;
pte = *ptep;
if (!pte_present(pte))
goto unlock;
goto no_page;
if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_write(pte))
goto unlock;
page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, pte);
if (unlikely(!page))
goto unlock;
goto bad_page;
if (flags & FOLL_GET)
get_page(page);
@ -1024,6 +1022,15 @@ unlock:
out:
return page;
bad_page:
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
no_page:
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
if (!pte_none(pte))
return page;
/* Fall through to ZERO_PAGE handling */
no_page_table:
/*
* When core dumping an enormous anonymous area that nobody
@ -1159,6 +1166,8 @@ int get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
cond_resched();
}
if (IS_ERR(page))
return i ? i : PTR_ERR(page);
if (pages) {
pages[i] = page;

View File

@ -865,6 +865,11 @@ static int do_move_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page_to_node *pm,
goto set_status;
page = follow_page(vma, pp->addr, FOLL_GET);
err = PTR_ERR(page);
if (IS_ERR(page))
goto set_status;
err = -ENOENT;
if (!page)
goto set_status;
@ -928,6 +933,11 @@ static int do_pages_stat(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page_to_node *pm)
goto set_status;
page = follow_page(vma, pm->addr, 0);
err = PTR_ERR(page);
if (IS_ERR(page))
goto set_status;
err = -ENOENT;
/* Use PageReserved to check for zero page */
if (!page || PageReserved(page))