dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Bluetooth: Remove useless flush_work() causing lockdep warnings 

The calls to flush_work() are pointless in a single thread workqueue
and they are actually causing a lockdep warning.

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.30-rc6-02911-gbb803cf #16
---------------------------------------------
bluetooth/2518 is trying to acquire lock:
 (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130c14>] flush_work+0x28/0xb0

but task is already holding lock:
 (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by bluetooth/2518:
 #0:  (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e
 #1:  (&conn->work_del){+.+...}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2518, comm: bluetooth Not tainted 2.6.30-rc6-02911-gbb803cf #16
Call Trace:
 [<c03d64d9>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
 [<c0140d96>] __lock_acquire+0x7ce/0xb1b
 [<c0141173>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xad
 [<c0130c14>] ? flush_work+0x28/0xb0
 [<c0130c2e>] flush_work+0x42/0xb0
 [<c0130c14>] ? flush_work+0x28/0xb0
 [<f8b84966>] del_conn+0x1c/0x84 [bluetooth]
 [<c0130469>] worker_thread+0x18e/0x25e
 [<c0130424>] ? worker_thread+0x149/0x25e
 [<f8b8494a>] ? del_conn+0x0/0x84 [bluetooth]
 [<c0133843>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x33
 [<c01302db>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x25e
 [<c013355a>] kthread+0x45/0x6b
 [<c0133515>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6b
 [<c01034a7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10

Based on a report by Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>

Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dave Young 2009-05-27 09:10:28 +02:00 committed by Marcel Holtmann
parent 7682455ec3
commit 4c71318948
1 changed files with 0 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c
View File

@ -90,9 +90,6 @@ static void add_conn(struct work_struct *work)
struct hci_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct hci_conn, work_add);
struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hdev;
/* ensure previous del is complete */
flush_work(&conn->work_del);
dev_set_name(&conn->dev, "%s:%d", hdev->name, conn->handle);
if (device_add(&conn->dev) < 0) {
@ -118,9 +115,6 @@ static void del_conn(struct work_struct *work)
struct hci_conn *conn = container_of(work, struct hci_conn, work_del);
struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hdev;
/* ensure previous add is complete */
flush_work(&conn->work_add);
if (!device_is_registered(&conn->dev))
return;