ide-tape: make function name more accurate
idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that more explicit and remove superfluous comment. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa36625bf7
commit
419d4741ce
1 changed files with 3 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -846,10 +846,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive)
|
||||
static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive)
|
||||
{
|
||||
idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
|
||||
idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage;
|
||||
|
@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (tape->next_stage != NULL) {
|
||||
idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
|
||||
idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Insert the next request into the request queue.
|
||||
|
@ -2414,7 +2411,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) {
|
||||
set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags);
|
||||
idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
|
||||
idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
|
||||
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue