From 28a51ba59a1a983d63d4775e9bb8230fe0fb3b29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:23:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: do not omit re-route check on NF_QUEUE verdict ret != NF_QUEUE only works in the "--queue-num 0" case; for queues > 0 the test should be '(ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK) != NF_QUEUE'. However, NF_QUEUE no longer DROPs the skb unconditionally if queueing fails (due to NF_VERDICT_FLAG_QUEUE_BYPASS verdict flag), so the re-route test should also be performed if this flag is set in the verdict. The full test would then look something like && ((ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK) == NF_QUEUE && (ret & NF_VERDICT_FLAG_QUEUE_BYPASS)) This is rather ugly, so just remove the NF_QUEUE test altogether. The only effect is that we might perform an unnecessary route lookup in the NF_QUEUE case. ip6table_mangle did not have such a check. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy --- net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c index 294a2a32f29..aef5d1fbe77 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ ipt_mangle_out(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *out) ret = ipt_do_table(skb, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, NULL, out, dev_net(out)->ipv4.iptable_mangle); /* Reroute for ANY change. */ - if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN && ret != NF_QUEUE) { + if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN) { iph = ip_hdr(skb); if (iph->saddr != saddr ||