From 2884f00b94be73a6a7875bada739bf9bb2f9a1b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Machek Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:15:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Document handling of bad memory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Document how to deal with bad memory reported with memtest. Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/bad_memory.txt | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/bad_memory.txt diff --git a/Documentation/bad_memory.txt b/Documentation/bad_memory.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df841621320 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/bad_memory.txt @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +March 2008 +Jan-Simon Moeller, dl9pf@gmx.de + + +How to deal with bad memory e.g. reported by memtest86+ ? +######################################################### + +There are three possibilities I know of: + +1) Reinsert/swap the memory modules + +2) Buy new modules (best!) or try to exchange the memory + if you have spare-parts + +3) Use BadRAM or memmap + +This Howto is about number 3) . + + +BadRAM +###### +BadRAM is the actively developed and available as kernel-patch +here: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ + +For more details see the BadRAM documentation. + +memmap +###### + +memmap is already in the kernel and usable as kernel-parameter at +boot-time. Its syntax is slightly strange and you may need to +calculate the values by yourself! + +Syntax to exclude a memory area (see kernel-parameters.txt for details): +memmap=$
+ +Example: memtest86+ reported here errors at address 0x18691458, 0x18698424 and + some others. All had 0x1869xxxx in common, so I chose a pattern of + 0x18690000,0xffff0000. + +With the numbers of the example above: +memmap=64K$0x18690000 + or +memmap=0x10000$0x18690000 +