From 12027f1b3fd69a4e9017e6b13c72547a99c6cf54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artem Bityutskiy Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:15:30 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] UBI: correct ubi_wl_flush locking Commit "62f38455 UBI: modify ubi_wl_flush function to clear work queue for a lnum" takes the 'work_sem' semaphore in write mode for the entire loop, which is not very good because it will block other workers for potentially long time. We do not need to have it in write mode - read mode is enough, and we do not need to hole it over the entire loop. So this patch turns changes the locking: takes 'work_sem' in read mode and pushes it down to the loop. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c index 9df100a4ec3..b6be644e7b8 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c @@ -1262,11 +1262,11 @@ int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum) dbg_wl("flush pending work for LEB %d:%d (%d pending works)", vol_id, lnum, ubi->works_count); - down_write(&ubi->work_sem); while (found) { struct ubi_work *wrk; found = 0; + down_read(&ubi->work_sem); spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock); list_for_each_entry(wrk, &ubi->works, list) { if ((vol_id == UBI_ALL || wrk->vol_id == vol_id) && @@ -1277,18 +1277,27 @@ int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum) spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock); err = wrk->func(ubi, wrk, 0); - if (err) - goto out; + if (err) { + up_read(&ubi->work_sem); + return err; + } + spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock); found = 1; break; } } spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock); + up_read(&ubi->work_sem); } -out: + /* + * Make sure all the works which have been done in parallel are + * finished. + */ + down_write(&ubi->work_sem); up_write(&ubi->work_sem); + return err; }