dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
This repository has been archived on 2022-02-17. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues or pull requests.
linux-2.6/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-reqbufs.xml

138 lines
4.8 KiB
XML
Raw Normal View History

<refentry id="vidioc-reqbufs">
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>ioctl VIDIOC_REQBUFS</refentrytitle>
&manvol;
</refmeta>
<refnamediv>
<refname>VIDIOC_REQBUFS</refname>
<refpurpose>Initiate Memory Mapping or User Pointer I/O</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
<funcsynopsis>
<funcprototype>
<funcdef>int <function>ioctl</function></funcdef>
<paramdef>int <parameter>fd</parameter></paramdef>
<paramdef>int <parameter>request</parameter></paramdef>
<paramdef>struct v4l2_requestbuffers *<parameter>argp</parameter></paramdef>
</funcprototype>
</funcsynopsis>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsect1>
<title>Arguments</title>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><parameter>fd</parameter></term>
<listitem>
<para>&fd;</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><parameter>request</parameter></term>
<listitem>
<para>VIDIOC_REQBUFS</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><parameter>argp</parameter></term>
<listitem>
<para></para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Description</title>
<para>This ioctl is used to initiate <link linkend="mmap">memory mapped</link>,
<link linkend="userp">user pointer</link> or <link
linkend="dmabuf">DMABUF</link> based I/O. Memory mapped buffers are located in
device memory and must be allocated with this ioctl before they can be mapped
into the application's address space. User buffers are allocated by
applications themselves, and this ioctl is merely used to switch the driver
into user pointer I/O mode and to setup some internal structures.
Similarly, DMABUF buffers are allocated by applications through a device
driver, and this ioctl only configures the driver into DMABUF I/O mode without
performing any direct allocation.</para>
<para>To allocate device buffers applications initialize all fields of the
<structname>v4l2_requestbuffers</structname> structure. They set the
<structfield>type</structfield> field to the respective stream or buffer type,
the <structfield>count</structfield> field to the desired number of buffers,
<structfield>memory</structfield> must be set to the requested I/O method and
the <structfield>reserved</structfield> array must be zeroed. When the ioctl is
called with a pointer to this structure the driver will attempt to allocate the
requested number of buffers and it stores the actual number allocated in the
<structfield>count</structfield> field. It can be smaller than the number
requested, even zero, when the driver runs out of free memory. A larger number
is also possible when the driver requires more buffers to function correctly.
For example video output requires at least two buffers, one displayed and one
filled by the application.</para>
<para>When the I/O method is not supported the ioctl
returns an &EINVAL;.</para>
<para>Applications can call <constant>VIDIOC_REQBUFS</constant>
again to change the number of buffers, however this cannot succeed
when any buffers are still mapped. A <structfield>count</structfield>
value of zero frees all buffers, after aborting or finishing any DMA
in progress, an implicit &VIDIOC-STREAMOFF;. <!-- mhs: I see no
reason why munmap()ping one or even all buffers must imply
streamoff.--></para>
<table pgwide="1" frame="none" id="v4l2-requestbuffers">
<title>struct <structname>v4l2_requestbuffers</structname></title>
<tgroup cols="3">
&cs-str;
<tbody valign="top">
<row>
<entry>__u32</entry>
<entry><structfield>count</structfield></entry>
<entry>The number of buffers requested or granted.</entry>
</row>
<row>
[media] v4l2: use __u32 rather than enums in ioctl() structs V4L2 uses the enum type in IOCTL arguments in IOCTLs that were defined until the use of enum was considered less than ideal. Recently Rémi Denis-Courmont brought up the issue by proposing a patch to convert the enums to unsigned: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg46167.html> This sparked a long discussion where another solution to the issue was proposed: two sets of IOCTL structures, one with __u32 and the other with enums, and conversion code between the two: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg47168.html> Both approaches implement a complete solution that resolves the problem. The first one is simple but requires assuming enums and __u32 are the same in size (so we won't break the ABI) while the second one is more complex and less clean but does not require making that assumption. The issue boils down to whether enums are fundamentally different from __u32 or not, and can the former be substituted by the latter. During the discussion it was concluded that the __u32 has the same size as enums on all archs Linux is supported: it has not been shown that replacing those enums in IOCTL arguments would break neither source or binary compatibility. If no such reason is found, just replacing the enums with __u32s is the way to go. This is what this patch does. This patch is slightly different from Remi's first RFC (link above): it uses __u32 instead of unsigned and also changes the arguments of VIDIOC_G_PRIORITY and VIDIOC_S_PRIORITY. Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-05-10 05:02:07 +00:00
<entry>__u32</entry>
<entry><structfield>type</structfield></entry>
<entry>Type of the stream or buffers, this is the same
as the &v4l2-format; <structfield>type</structfield> field. See <xref
linkend="v4l2-buf-type" /> for valid values.</entry>
</row>
<row>
[media] v4l2: use __u32 rather than enums in ioctl() structs V4L2 uses the enum type in IOCTL arguments in IOCTLs that were defined until the use of enum was considered less than ideal. Recently Rémi Denis-Courmont brought up the issue by proposing a patch to convert the enums to unsigned: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg46167.html> This sparked a long discussion where another solution to the issue was proposed: two sets of IOCTL structures, one with __u32 and the other with enums, and conversion code between the two: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg47168.html> Both approaches implement a complete solution that resolves the problem. The first one is simple but requires assuming enums and __u32 are the same in size (so we won't break the ABI) while the second one is more complex and less clean but does not require making that assumption. The issue boils down to whether enums are fundamentally different from __u32 or not, and can the former be substituted by the latter. During the discussion it was concluded that the __u32 has the same size as enums on all archs Linux is supported: it has not been shown that replacing those enums in IOCTL arguments would break neither source or binary compatibility. If no such reason is found, just replacing the enums with __u32s is the way to go. This is what this patch does. This patch is slightly different from Remi's first RFC (link above): it uses __u32 instead of unsigned and also changes the arguments of VIDIOC_G_PRIORITY and VIDIOC_S_PRIORITY. Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-05-10 05:02:07 +00:00
<entry>__u32</entry>
<entry><structfield>memory</structfield></entry>
<entry>Applications set this field to
<constant>V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP</constant>,
<constant>V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF</constant> or
[media] v4l2: use __u32 rather than enums in ioctl() structs V4L2 uses the enum type in IOCTL arguments in IOCTLs that were defined until the use of enum was considered less than ideal. Recently Rémi Denis-Courmont brought up the issue by proposing a patch to convert the enums to unsigned: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg46167.html> This sparked a long discussion where another solution to the issue was proposed: two sets of IOCTL structures, one with __u32 and the other with enums, and conversion code between the two: <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg47168.html> Both approaches implement a complete solution that resolves the problem. The first one is simple but requires assuming enums and __u32 are the same in size (so we won't break the ABI) while the second one is more complex and less clean but does not require making that assumption. The issue boils down to whether enums are fundamentally different from __u32 or not, and can the former be substituted by the latter. During the discussion it was concluded that the __u32 has the same size as enums on all archs Linux is supported: it has not been shown that replacing those enums in IOCTL arguments would break neither source or binary compatibility. If no such reason is found, just replacing the enums with __u32s is the way to go. This is what this patch does. This patch is slightly different from Remi's first RFC (link above): it uses __u32 instead of unsigned and also changes the arguments of VIDIOC_G_PRIORITY and VIDIOC_S_PRIORITY. Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-05-10 05:02:07 +00:00
<constant>V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR</constant>. See <xref linkend="v4l2-memory"
/>.</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>__u32</entry>
<entry><structfield>reserved</structfield>[2]</entry>
<entry>A place holder for future extensions. This array should
be zeroed by applications.</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
&return-value;
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><errorcode>EINVAL</errorcode></term>
<listitem>
<para>The buffer type (<structfield>type</structfield> field) or the
requested I/O method (<structfield>memory</structfield>) is not
supported.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect1>
</refentry>