dect
/
linux-2.6
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity
This repository has been archived on 2022-02-17. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues or pull requests.
linux-2.6/fs/romfs/super.c

665 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
/* Block- or MTD-based romfs
*
* Copyright © 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
*
* Derived from: ROMFS file system, Linux implementation
*
* Copyright © 1997-1999 Janos Farkas <chexum@shadow.banki.hu>
*
* Using parts of the minix filesystem
* Copyright © 1991, 1992 Linus Torvalds
*
* and parts of the affs filesystem additionally
* Copyright © 1993 Ray Burr
* Copyright © 1996 Hans-Joachim Widmaier
*
* Changes
* Changed for 2.1.19 modules
* Jan 1997 Initial release
* Jun 1997 2.1.43+ changes
* Proper page locking in readpage
* Changed to work with 2.1.45+ fs
* Jul 1997 Fixed follow_link
* 2.1.47
* lookup shouldn't return -ENOENT
* from Horst von Brand:
* fail on wrong checksum
* double unlock_super was possible
* correct namelen for statfs
* spotted by Bill Hawes:
* readlink shouldn't iput()
* Jun 1998 2.1.106 from Avery Pennarun: glibc scandir()
* exposed a problem in readdir
* 2.1.107 code-freeze spellchecker run
* Aug 1998 2.1.118+ VFS changes
* Sep 1998 2.1.122 another VFS change (follow_link)
* Apr 1999 2.2.7 no more EBADF checking in
* lookup/readdir, use ERR_PTR
* Jun 1999 2.3.6 d_alloc_root use changed
* 2.3.9 clean up usage of ENOENT/negative
* dentries in lookup
* clean up page flags setting
* (error, uptodate, locking) in
* in readpage
* use init_special_inode for
* fifos/sockets (and streamline) in
* read_inode, fix _ops table order
* Aug 1999 2.3.16 __initfunc() => __init change
* Oct 1999 2.3.24 page->owner hack obsoleted
* Nov 1999 2.3.27 2.3.25+ page->offset => index change
*
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/parser.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/statfs.h>
#include <linux/mtd/super.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include "internal.h"
static struct kmem_cache *romfs_inode_cachep;
static const umode_t romfs_modemap[8] = {
0, /* hard link */
S_IFDIR | 0644, /* directory */
S_IFREG | 0644, /* regular file */
S_IFLNK | 0777, /* symlink */
S_IFBLK | 0600, /* blockdev */
S_IFCHR | 0600, /* chardev */
S_IFSOCK | 0644, /* socket */
S_IFIFO | 0644 /* FIFO */
};
static const unsigned char romfs_dtype_table[] = {
DT_UNKNOWN, DT_DIR, DT_REG, DT_LNK, DT_BLK, DT_CHR, DT_SOCK, DT_FIFO
};
static struct inode *romfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long pos);
/*
* read a page worth of data from the image
*/
static int romfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
{
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
loff_t offset, size;
unsigned long fillsize, pos;
void *buf;
int ret;
buf = kmap(page);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
/* 32 bit warning -- but not for us :) */
offset = page_offset(page);
size = i_size_read(inode);
fillsize = 0;
ret = 0;
if (offset < size) {
size -= offset;
fillsize = size > PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE : size;
pos = ROMFS_I(inode)->i_dataoffset + offset;
ret = romfs_dev_read(inode->i_sb, pos, buf, fillsize);
if (ret < 0) {
SetPageError(page);
fillsize = 0;
ret = -EIO;
}
}
if (fillsize < PAGE_SIZE)
memset(buf + fillsize, 0, PAGE_SIZE - fillsize);
if (ret == 0)
SetPageUptodate(page);
flush_dcache_page(page);
kunmap(page);
unlock_page(page);
return ret;
}
static const struct address_space_operations romfs_aops = {
.readpage = romfs_readpage
};
/*
* read the entries from a directory
*/
static int romfs_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent, filldir_t filldir)
{
struct inode *i = filp->f_dentry->d_inode;
struct romfs_inode ri;
unsigned long offset, maxoff;
int j, ino, nextfh;
int stored = 0;
char fsname[ROMFS_MAXFN]; /* XXX dynamic? */
int ret;
maxoff = romfs_maxsize(i->i_sb);
offset = filp->f_pos;
if (!offset) {
offset = i->i_ino & ROMFH_MASK;
ret = romfs_dev_read(i->i_sb, offset, &ri, ROMFH_SIZE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
offset = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec) & ROMFH_MASK;
}
/* Not really failsafe, but we are read-only... */
for (;;) {
if (!offset || offset >= maxoff) {
offset = maxoff;
filp->f_pos = offset;
goto out;
}
filp->f_pos = offset;
/* Fetch inode info */
ret = romfs_dev_read(i->i_sb, offset, &ri, ROMFH_SIZE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
j = romfs_dev_strnlen(i->i_sb, offset + ROMFH_SIZE,
sizeof(fsname) - 1);
if (j < 0)
goto out;
ret = romfs_dev_read(i->i_sb, offset + ROMFH_SIZE, fsname, j);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
fsname[j] = '\0';
ino = offset;
nextfh = be32_to_cpu(ri.next);
if ((nextfh & ROMFH_TYPE) == ROMFH_HRD)
ino = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec);
if (filldir(dirent, fsname, j, offset, ino,
romfs_dtype_table[nextfh & ROMFH_TYPE]) < 0)
goto out;
stored++;
offset = nextfh & ROMFH_MASK;
}
out:
return stored;
}
/*
* look up an entry in a directory
*/
static struct dentry *romfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
stop passing nameidata to ->lookup() Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-06-10 21:13:09 +00:00
unsigned int flags)
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
{
unsigned long offset, maxoff;
struct inode *inode;
struct romfs_inode ri;
const char *name; /* got from dentry */
int len, ret;
offset = dir->i_ino & ROMFH_MASK;
ret = romfs_dev_read(dir->i_sb, offset, &ri, ROMFH_SIZE);
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
/* search all the file entries in the list starting from the one
* pointed to by the directory's special data */
maxoff = romfs_maxsize(dir->i_sb);
offset = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec) & ROMFH_MASK;
name = dentry->d_name.name;
len = dentry->d_name.len;
for (;;) {
if (!offset || offset >= maxoff)
goto out0;
ret = romfs_dev_read(dir->i_sb, offset, &ri, sizeof(ri));
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
/* try to match the first 16 bytes of name */
ROMFS: romfs_lookup() shouldn't be doing a partial name comparison romfs_lookup() should be using a routine akin to strcmp() on the backing store, rather than one akin to strncmp(). If it uses the latter, it's liable to match /bin/shutdown when looking up /bin/sh. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-23 15:41:13 +00:00
ret = romfs_dev_strcmp(dir->i_sb, offset + ROMFH_SIZE, name,
len);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
if (ret == 1)
break;
/* next entry */
offset = be32_to_cpu(ri.next) & ROMFH_MASK;
}
/* Hard link handling */
if ((be32_to_cpu(ri.next) & ROMFH_TYPE) == ROMFH_HRD)
offset = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec) & ROMFH_MASK;
inode = romfs_iget(dir->i_sb, offset);
if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(inode);
goto error;
}
goto outi;
/*
* it's a bit funky, _lookup needs to return an error code
* (negative) or a NULL, both as a dentry. ENOENT should not
* be returned, instead we need to create a negative dentry by
* d_add(dentry, NULL); and return 0 as no error.
* (Although as I see, it only matters on writable file
* systems).
*/
out0:
inode = NULL;
outi:
d_add(dentry, inode);
ret = 0;
error:
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static const struct file_operations romfs_dir_operations = {
.read = generic_read_dir,
.readdir = romfs_readdir,
llseek: automatically add .llseek fop All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2010-08-15 16:52:59 +00:00
.llseek = default_llseek,
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
};
const: mark remaining inode_operations as const Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 00:01:11 +00:00
static const struct inode_operations romfs_dir_inode_operations = {
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
.lookup = romfs_lookup,
};
/*
* get a romfs inode based on its position in the image (which doubles as the
* inode number)
*/
static struct inode *romfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long pos)
{
struct romfs_inode_info *inode;
struct romfs_inode ri;
struct inode *i;
unsigned long nlen;
ROMFS: romfs_dev_read() error ignored romfs_dev_read() may return -EIO, but ret is unsigned, so the errorpath isn't taken. Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-04-26 12:51:17 +00:00
unsigned nextfh;
int ret;
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
umode_t mode;
/* we might have to traverse a chain of "hard link" file entries to get
* to the actual file */
for (;;) {
ret = romfs_dev_read(sb, pos, &ri, sizeof(ri));
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
/* XXX: do romfs_checksum here too (with name) */
nextfh = be32_to_cpu(ri.next);
if ((nextfh & ROMFH_TYPE) != ROMFH_HRD)
break;
pos = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec) & ROMFH_MASK;
}
/* determine the length of the filename */
nlen = romfs_dev_strnlen(sb, pos + ROMFH_SIZE, ROMFS_MAXFN);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(nlen))
goto eio;
/* get an inode for this image position */
i = iget_locked(sb, pos);
if (!i)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (!(i->i_state & I_NEW))
return i;
/* precalculate the data offset */
inode = ROMFS_I(i);
inode->i_metasize = (ROMFH_SIZE + nlen + 1 + ROMFH_PAD) & ROMFH_MASK;
inode->i_dataoffset = pos + inode->i_metasize;
filesystems: add set_nlink() Replace remaining direct i_nlink updates with a new set_nlink() updater function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2011-10-28 12:13:29 +00:00
set_nlink(i, 1); /* Hard to decide.. */
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
i->i_size = be32_to_cpu(ri.size);
i->i_mtime.tv_sec = i->i_atime.tv_sec = i->i_ctime.tv_sec = 0;
i->i_mtime.tv_nsec = i->i_atime.tv_nsec = i->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
/* set up mode and ops */
mode = romfs_modemap[nextfh & ROMFH_TYPE];
switch (nextfh & ROMFH_TYPE) {
case ROMFH_DIR:
i->i_size = ROMFS_I(i)->i_metasize;
i->i_op = &romfs_dir_inode_operations;
i->i_fop = &romfs_dir_operations;
if (nextfh & ROMFH_EXEC)
mode |= S_IXUGO;
break;
case ROMFH_REG:
i->i_fop = &romfs_ro_fops;
i->i_data.a_ops = &romfs_aops;
if (i->i_sb->s_mtd)
i->i_data.backing_dev_info =
i->i_sb->s_mtd->backing_dev_info;
if (nextfh & ROMFH_EXEC)
mode |= S_IXUGO;
break;
case ROMFH_SYM:
i->i_op = &page_symlink_inode_operations;
i->i_data.a_ops = &romfs_aops;
mode |= S_IRWXUGO;
break;
default:
/* depending on MBZ for sock/fifos */
nextfh = be32_to_cpu(ri.spec);
init_special_inode(i, mode, MKDEV(nextfh >> 16,
nextfh & 0xffff));
break;
}
i->i_mode = mode;
unlock_new_inode(i);
return i;
eio:
ret = -EIO;
error:
printk(KERN_ERR "ROMFS: read error for inode 0x%lx\n", pos);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
/*
* allocate a new inode
*/
static struct inode *romfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct romfs_inode_info *inode;
inode = kmem_cache_alloc(romfs_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
return inode ? &inode->vfs_inode : NULL;
}
/*
* return a spent inode to the slab cache
*/
fs: icache RCU free inodes RCU free the struct inode. This will allow: - Subsequent store-free path walking patch. The inode must be consulted for permissions when walking, so an RCU inode reference is a must. - sb_inode_list_lock to be moved inside i_lock because sb list walkers who want to take i_lock no longer need to take sb_inode_list_lock to walk the list in the first place. This will simplify and optimize locking. - Could remove some nested trylock loops in dcache code - Could potentially simplify things a bit in VM land. Do not need to take the page lock to follow page->mapping. The downsides of this is the performance cost of using RCU. In a simple creat/unlink microbenchmark, performance drops by about 10% due to inability to reuse cache-hot slab objects. As iterations increase and RCU freeing starts kicking over, this increases to about 20%. In cases where inode lifetimes are longer (ie. many inodes may be allocated during the average life span of a single inode), a lot of this cache reuse is not applicable, so the regression caused by this patch is smaller. The cache-hot regression could largely be avoided by using SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, however this adds some complexity to list walking and store-free path walking, so I prefer to implement this at a later date, if it is shown to be a win in real situations. I haven't found a regression in any non-micro benchmark so I doubt it will be a problem. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
2011-01-07 06:49:49 +00:00
static void romfs_i_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
{
fs: icache RCU free inodes RCU free the struct inode. This will allow: - Subsequent store-free path walking patch. The inode must be consulted for permissions when walking, so an RCU inode reference is a must. - sb_inode_list_lock to be moved inside i_lock because sb list walkers who want to take i_lock no longer need to take sb_inode_list_lock to walk the list in the first place. This will simplify and optimize locking. - Could remove some nested trylock loops in dcache code - Could potentially simplify things a bit in VM land. Do not need to take the page lock to follow page->mapping. The downsides of this is the performance cost of using RCU. In a simple creat/unlink microbenchmark, performance drops by about 10% due to inability to reuse cache-hot slab objects. As iterations increase and RCU freeing starts kicking over, this increases to about 20%. In cases where inode lifetimes are longer (ie. many inodes may be allocated during the average life span of a single inode), a lot of this cache reuse is not applicable, so the regression caused by this patch is smaller. The cache-hot regression could largely be avoided by using SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, however this adds some complexity to list walking and store-free path walking, so I prefer to implement this at a later date, if it is shown to be a win in real situations. I haven't found a regression in any non-micro benchmark so I doubt it will be a problem. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
2011-01-07 06:49:49 +00:00
struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
kmem_cache_free(romfs_inode_cachep, ROMFS_I(inode));
}
fs: icache RCU free inodes RCU free the struct inode. This will allow: - Subsequent store-free path walking patch. The inode must be consulted for permissions when walking, so an RCU inode reference is a must. - sb_inode_list_lock to be moved inside i_lock because sb list walkers who want to take i_lock no longer need to take sb_inode_list_lock to walk the list in the first place. This will simplify and optimize locking. - Could remove some nested trylock loops in dcache code - Could potentially simplify things a bit in VM land. Do not need to take the page lock to follow page->mapping. The downsides of this is the performance cost of using RCU. In a simple creat/unlink microbenchmark, performance drops by about 10% due to inability to reuse cache-hot slab objects. As iterations increase and RCU freeing starts kicking over, this increases to about 20%. In cases where inode lifetimes are longer (ie. many inodes may be allocated during the average life span of a single inode), a lot of this cache reuse is not applicable, so the regression caused by this patch is smaller. The cache-hot regression could largely be avoided by using SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, however this adds some complexity to list walking and store-free path walking, so I prefer to implement this at a later date, if it is shown to be a win in real situations. I haven't found a regression in any non-micro benchmark so I doubt it will be a problem. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
2011-01-07 06:49:49 +00:00
static void romfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, romfs_i_callback);
}
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
/*
* get filesystem statistics
*/
static int romfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
{
fs/romfs: return f_fsid for statfs(2) Make romfs return f_fsid info for statfs(2). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <coly.li@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-07 02:01:12 +00:00
struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
u64 id = huge_encode_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
buf->f_type = ROMFS_MAGIC;
buf->f_namelen = ROMFS_MAXFN;
buf->f_bsize = ROMBSIZE;
buf->f_bfree = buf->f_bavail = buf->f_ffree;
buf->f_blocks =
(romfs_maxsize(dentry->d_sb) + ROMBSIZE - 1) >> ROMBSBITS;
fs/romfs: return f_fsid for statfs(2) Make romfs return f_fsid info for statfs(2). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <coly.li@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-07 02:01:12 +00:00
buf->f_fsid.val[0] = (u32)id;
buf->f_fsid.val[1] = (u32)(id >> 32);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
return 0;
}
/*
* remounting must involve read-only
*/
static int romfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
{
*flags |= MS_RDONLY;
return 0;
}
static const struct super_operations romfs_super_ops = {
.alloc_inode = romfs_alloc_inode,
.destroy_inode = romfs_destroy_inode,
.statfs = romfs_statfs,
.remount_fs = romfs_remount,
};
/*
* checksum check on part of a romfs filesystem
*/
static __u32 romfs_checksum(const void *data, int size)
{
const __be32 *ptr = data;
__u32 sum;
sum = 0;
size >>= 2;
while (size > 0) {
sum += be32_to_cpu(*ptr++);
size--;
}
return sum;
}
/*
* fill in the superblock
*/
static int romfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
{
struct romfs_super_block *rsb;
struct inode *root;
unsigned long pos, img_size;
const char *storage;
size_t len;
int ret;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
if (!sb->s_mtd) {
sb_set_blocksize(sb, ROMBSIZE);
} else {
sb->s_blocksize = ROMBSIZE;
sb->s_blocksize_bits = blksize_bits(ROMBSIZE);
}
#endif
sb->s_maxbytes = 0xFFFFFFFF;
sb->s_magic = ROMFS_MAGIC;
sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
sb->s_op = &romfs_super_ops;
/* read the image superblock and check it */
rsb = kmalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rsb)
return -ENOMEM;
sb->s_fs_info = (void *) 512;
ret = romfs_dev_read(sb, 0, rsb, 512);
if (ret < 0)
goto error_rsb;
img_size = be32_to_cpu(rsb->size);
if (sb->s_mtd && img_size > sb->s_mtd->size)
goto error_rsb_inval;
sb->s_fs_info = (void *) img_size;
if (rsb->word0 != ROMSB_WORD0 || rsb->word1 != ROMSB_WORD1 ||
img_size < ROMFH_SIZE) {
if (!silent)
printk(KERN_WARNING "VFS:"
" Can't find a romfs filesystem on dev %s.\n",
sb->s_id);
goto error_rsb_inval;
}
if (romfs_checksum(rsb, min_t(size_t, img_size, 512))) {
printk(KERN_ERR "ROMFS: bad initial checksum on dev %s.\n",
sb->s_id);
goto error_rsb_inval;
}
storage = sb->s_mtd ? "MTD" : "the block layer";
len = strnlen(rsb->name, ROMFS_MAXFN);
if (!silent)
printk(KERN_NOTICE "ROMFS: Mounting image '%*.*s' through %s\n",
(unsigned) len, (unsigned) len, rsb->name, storage);
kfree(rsb);
rsb = NULL;
/* find the root directory */
pos = (ROMFH_SIZE + len + 1 + ROMFH_PAD) & ROMFH_MASK;
root = romfs_iget(sb, pos);
fs/romfs: correct error-handling code romfs_iget returns an ERR_PTR value in an error case instead of NULL. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @match exists@ expression x, E; statement S1, S2; @@ x = romfs_iget(...) ... when != x = E ( * if (x == NULL || ...) S1 else S2 | * if (x == NULL && ...) S1 else S2 ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-23 22:57:35 +00:00
if (IS_ERR(root))
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
goto error;
switch open-coded instances of d_make_root() to new helper Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-01-09 03:15:13 +00:00
sb->s_root = d_make_root(root);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
if (!sb->s_root)
switch open-coded instances of d_make_root() to new helper Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-01-09 03:15:13 +00:00
goto error;
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
return 0;
error:
return -EINVAL;
error_rsb_inval:
ret = -EINVAL;
error_rsb:
fix leak in romfs_fill_super() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-01-25 11:05:54 +00:00
kfree(rsb);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
return ret;
}
/*
* get a superblock for mounting
*/
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
static struct dentry *romfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
int flags, const char *dev_name,
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
void *data)
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
{
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
struct dentry *ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
ret = mount_mtd(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data, romfs_fill_super);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
if (ret == ERR_PTR(-EINVAL))
ret = mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data,
romfs_fill_super);
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
#endif
return ret;
}
/*
* destroy a romfs superblock in the appropriate manner
*/
static void romfs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD
if (sb->s_mtd) {
kill_mtd_super(sb);
return;
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
if (sb->s_bdev) {
kill_block_super(sb);
return;
}
#endif
}
static struct file_system_type romfs_fs_type = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "romfs",
convert get_sb_mtd() users to ->mount() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-07-24 20:56:46 +00:00
.mount = romfs_mount,
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
.kill_sb = romfs_kill_sb,
.fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV,
};
/*
* inode storage initialiser
*/
static void romfs_i_init_once(void *_inode)
{
struct romfs_inode_info *inode = _inode;
inode_init_once(&inode->vfs_inode);
}
/*
* romfs module initialisation
*/
static int __init init_romfs_fs(void)
{
int ret;
printk(KERN_INFO "ROMFS MTD (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc.\n");
romfs_inode_cachep =
kmem_cache_create("romfs_i",
sizeof(struct romfs_inode_info), 0,
SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
romfs_i_init_once);
if (!romfs_inode_cachep) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"ROMFS error: Failed to initialise inode cache\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
ret = register_filesystem(&romfs_fs_type);
if (ret) {
printk(KERN_ERR "ROMFS error: Failed to register filesystem\n");
goto error_register;
}
return 0;
error_register:
kmem_cache_destroy(romfs_inode_cachep);
return ret;
}
/*
* romfs module removal
*/
static void __exit exit_romfs_fs(void)
{
unregister_filesystem(&romfs_fs_type);
fs: push rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() to filesystems There's no reason to call rcu_barrier() on every deactivate_locked_super(). We only need to make sure that all delayed rcu free inodes are flushed before we destroy related cache. Removing rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() affects some fast paths. E.g. on my machine exit_group() of a last process in IPC namespace takes 0.07538s. rcu_barrier() takes 0.05188s of that time. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-09-26 01:33:07 +00:00
/*
* Make sure all delayed rcu free inodes are flushed before we
* destroy cache.
*/
rcu_barrier();
NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directly Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2009-02-12 10:40:10 +00:00
kmem_cache_destroy(romfs_inode_cachep);
}
module_init(init_romfs_fs);
module_exit(exit_romfs_fs);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Direct-MTD Capable RomFS");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Red Hat, Inc.");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); /* Actually dual-licensed, but it doesn't matter for */