Patch Set 1:
I agree, using the term TX/RX "path" sounds better to me, but I tried to stick to UHD terminology.
> Adding more command-line arguments is in-line with the current
> "architecture" but becomes more and more clumsy and cumbersom - at
> some point we have to introduce the libosmovty based config file
> that we're talking about for years. The question is whether we
> should keep adding new argumetns, or simply refuse to do so until a
> config file exists...
I agree that we should move to VTY, as it starts to be cumbersome to add more parameters and manage them. There's a ticket already created to do it: https://osmocom.org/issues/2183. Shall we increase priority? I or someone else can work on that at some point.
However, I still think having this RX/TX antenna support has more priority so let's merge it for now and drop all the parameters later.
Patch-set: 1
7d8cc3bc8c