This commit extends get_ms() to really compare the IMSI if it has
been given. Matching by TLLI has a higher precedence than matching by
IMSI.
Ticket: #1674
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently the IMSI is stored in the TBFs. Since it directly refers to
an MS, it should rather be stored in an MS object.
This patch move the m_imsi field from gprs_rlcmac_tbf to GprsMs,
changes gprs_rlcmac_tbf::imsi() to get the IMSI from the associated
MS object, and adds getter and setter to GprsMs. Before changing the
IMSI of the associated MS object, assign_imsi() checks if there is
already another MS object with the same IMSI and eventually resets
the IMSI of that one. So using update_ms() and assign_imsi() ensures
that there are not two MS object entries is the storage with the
same TLLI or the same IMSI.
Ticket: #1674
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently the generated IMSI contains blanks due to a missing '0'
flag in the corresponding snprintf statement. In addition, the buffer
is effectively limited to 15 bytes which is shorter than the
generated character sequence, such that the last character of the
IMSI is removed.
This patch fixes both issues. Since snprintf itself will add a
terminating \0 character, the whole buffer can be passed to snprintf.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently the m_tlli member in GprsMs is set by the constructor,
circumventing the TLLI confirmation mechanism.
This commit replaces the get_or_create_ms() method by a create_ms()
method which takes the TLLI and the direction (UL or DL) as
parameters to select either set_tlli() or confirm_tlli(). The MS
object is instantiated with TLLI = 0, and therefore GprsMs::tlli() is
extended to return the DL TLLI if both of the other TLLI are not set.
Note that create_ms() will not check whether an MS object with a
matching TLLI is already stored in the list, so it should only be
called after a corresponding get_ms() in general.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently the TLLI is stored in each TBF. Since each MS is now
represented by a GprsMs object which takes care of TLLI updating,
and each TBF that has been associated with an TLLI also contains a
reference to a GprsMs object, per TBF TLLI handling is no longer
needed. Keeping all TBF m_tlli members up to date is complex and
doesn't currently work correctly in all circumstances.
This commit removes m_tlli and related members from the TBF class and
the tbf_by_tlli functions from the BTS class.
Ticket: #1674
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
The type of the TBF update_ms() is being called on does not always
reflect whether the TLLI has been signaled by the MS or the SGSN.
This commit adds an additional parameter to tell the method, in which
direction the TLLI has been passed.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
According to the specification (GSM 04.08/24.008, 4.7.1.5) after a
new P-TMSI has been assigned, the old P-TMSI must be kept basically
until it has been used by both sides. Since the TLLI will be derived
from the P-TMSI, the old TLLI must also be kept until the new TLLI
has been used by both MS and SGSN.
This commit modifies the TLLI handling of GprsMs accordingly.
set_tlli() is only used with TLLIs derived from MS messages,
confirm_tlli() is used with TLLIs derived from messages received from
the SGSN. tlli() returns the value set by the MS. check_tlli()
matches each of the TLLI used by either MS or SGSN as well as the old
TLLI until it has been confirmed.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
To show the talloc report more easily, this commit adds a call to
talloc_report_full if the TALLOC_REPORT_FULL environment variable is
set (the value is ignored). Since the stderr output is checked by the
test suite, this feature is not enabled by default.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently the ul_tbf is used in its own declaration as an argument to
tbf_alloc_ul_tbf, where dl_tbf can be used instead and makes more
sense.
This commit uses dl_tbf instead of ul_tbf as old_tbf.
Addresses:
tbf/TbfTest.cpp:71:14: warning: ‘ul_tbf’ may be used uninitialized in
this function
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently fn and block_nr are not incremented correctly. In addition,
the comments around the sending of blocks are not accurate either.
This commit introduces the send_rlc_block helper function which takes
care of the increments, updates the comments to reflect what is
really happening, and adds assertion to verify at least some aspects
of what is now stated in the comments.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Put the generic parts of test_tbf_final_ack into helper functions to
reduce the size of the test and to avoid too much code duplication
when creating new tests.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Currently if a 'new' TBF is freed before the 'old' one (where
old_tbf->m_new_tbf == new_tbf), the old_tbf->m_new_tbf is not cleared
and can be accessed later on. This can lead to inconsistencies or
segmentation faults.
This commit adds m_old_tbf which points back from new_tbf to old_pdf.
m_new_tbf and m_old_tbf are either both set to NULL or one is the
reverse pointer of the other (tbf->m_new_tbf->m_old_tbf == tbf and
tbf->m_old_tbf->m_new_tbf == tbf). It extends set_new_tbf and
tbf_free to update the pointee accordingly.
The TBF test is extended to check this invariant at several places.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
When new_tbf is freed before dl_tbf in test_tbf_final_ack, dl_tbf
still contains a pointer to it in m_new_tbf.
This patch changes the test to accept a test mode parameter and runs
it twice which a different order of tbf_free in each run. Consistency
checks are added, to check for a danglilng m_new_tbf pointer in both
cases.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
The test called the llc enqueue() function directly which didn't take
care of prepending the tv values for the timeout to the data.
Now the test uses dl_tbf.append() which takes care of prepending the tv
values. With this patch make distcheck on jenkins should no longer fail
with "Discarding LLC PDU because lifetime limit reached." messages.
UL and DL tbfs are used in very separate parts and are not the same
thing so split the alloc function and use the UL/DL version throughout
the code.
Ticket: SYS#389
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
During a routing area update a new P-TMSI was assigned. During
the PACKET CONTROL ACK on the DL we notice the change of TLLI
but didn't propagate this. This means that a Routing Area Update
Complete was only sent after a new RACH request.
Addresses:
<0007> gprs_rlcmac_meas.cpp:103 UL RSSI of TLLI=0x88661bc6: -67 dBm
<0002> bts.cpp:945 Got ACK, but UL TBF is gone TLLI=0xe512eba3
<0007> gprs_rlcmac_meas.cpp:158 DL packet loss of IMSI=274080000004765 / TLLI=0xe512eba3: 0%
<0002> tbf.cpp:668 TBF TFI=0 TLLI=0x88661bc6 T3169 timeout during transsmission
<0002> tbf.cpp:690 - Assignment was on PACCH
<0002> tbf.cpp:694 - No uplink data received yet
Jacob Erlbeck
Daniel Willmann